ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF GAS CONDENSATE–DERIVED SOLVENTS AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES

ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ ВОЗДЕЙСТВИЕ РАСТВОРИТЕЛЕЙ, ПОЛУЧЕННЫХ ИЗ ГАЗОКОНДЕНСАТА, И МЕТОДЫ ЕГО МИНИМИЗАЦИИ
Цитировать:
Muratalieva N.Kh., Juraev Sh., Safarov T.T. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF GAS CONDENSATE–DERIVED SOLVENTS AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES // Universum: технические науки : электрон. научн. журн. 2026. 3(144). URL: https://7universum.com/ru/tech/archive/item/22284 (дата обращения: 28.03.2026).
Прочитать статью:
DOI - 10.32743/UniTech.2026.144.3.22284

 

ABSTRACT

Gas condensate, a lightweight hydrocarbon mixture obtained as a byproduct of natural gas extraction, serves as a primary feedstock for producing industrial solvents used in applications such as enhanced oil recovery (EOR), cleaning agents, and coatings. While these solvents offer economic advantages due to their efficacy in dissolving organic materials, their lifecycle—from production to disposal—poses significant environmental challenges, including air and water pollution, soil degradation, and contributions to climate change. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the environmental impacts of these solvents, drawing from laboratory studies on volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, toxicity, and persistence. Furthermore, it explores mitigation strategies, such as the adoption of bio-based alternatives, solvent recovery technologies, thermochemical treatments, and regulatory frameworks, to minimize ecological footprints. Analysis of recent laboratory studies indicates that thermochemical mitigation can reduce condensate viscosity by 17-fold and recover up to 65% of trapped hydrocarbons, while transitioning to green solvents can lower emissions by up to 80% (2).

АННОТАЦИЯ

Газовый конденсат, легкая углеводородная смесь, получаемая как побочный продукт добычи природного газа, служит основным сырьем для производства промышленных растворителей, используемых в таких приложениях, как усиленная добыча нефти (EOR), чистящие средства и покрытия. Хотя эти растворители предлагают экономические преимущества благодаря их эффективности в растворении органических материалов, их жизненный цикл — от производства до утилизации — создает значительные экологические проблемы, включая загрязнение воздуха и воды, деградацию почвы и вклад в изменение климата. Этот обзор синтезирует текущие знания об экологическом воздействии этих растворителей, опираясь на лабораторные исследования эмиссий летучих органических соединений (ЛОС), токсичности и стойкости. Кроме того, он исследует стратегии смягчения, такие как внедрение биооснованных альтернатив, технологии регенерации растворителей, термохимические обработки и регуляторные рамки, для минимизации экологического следа. Лабораторные данные указывают, что термохимическое смягчение может снизить вязкость конденсата в 17 раз и восстановить до 65% захваченных углеводородов, в то время как переход на зеленые растворители может снизить эмиссии до 80%.

 

Keywords: gas condensate solvents, environmental impact, VOC emissions, hydrocarbon pollution, green solvents, mitigation strategies, sustainable chemistry.

Ключевые слова: растворители из газового конденсата, экологическое воздействие, эмиссии ЛОС, углеводородное загрязнение, зеленые растворители, стратегии смягчения, устойчивая химия.

 

Introduction

Natural gas condensate, comprising primarily C5–C12 hydrocarbons, is refined into solvents like naphtha and white spirits, which are integral to industries including petroleum extraction, manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals (10). These solvents enhance processes such as solvent-aided thermal recovery in oil sands, where they mobilize viscous hydrocarbons, potentially lowering energy demands compared to steam injection (1).

However, their volatile nature leads to substantial environmental risks, exacerbated by increasing global production of natural gas. This paper reviews the multifaceted impacts on air, water, and soil, supported by precise laboratory analyses, while proposing evidence-based mitigation methods to align with sustainable development goals. Therefore, the primary objective of this review is to critically analyze existing laboratory data on the environmental toxicity of gas condensate-derived solvents and evaluate the efficacy of current mitigation strategies. Specifically, this study aims to: (1) quantify VOC emission rates based on recent experimental data; (2) assess ecotoxicity thresholds for marine species; and (3) compare the efficiency of thermochemical versus bio-based mitigation methods. The novelty of this work lies in the comparative synthesis of thermochemical recovery data alongside green solvent alternatives, providing a unified framework for selecting mitigation strategies based on specific environmental compartments (air vs. water).

Literature Review

While extensive research highlights the environmental hazards of hydrocarbon solvents, there is a divergence in reported toxicity thresholds. For instance, Negri et al. (2021) [2] emphasize long-term ecological damage through bioaccumulation, whereas Stockwell et al. (2021) [4] focus primarily on immediate VOC emission rates. This discrepancy suggests that current literature often separates air quality impacts from aquatic toxicity, lacking an integrated lifecycle assessment. Furthermore, while Green chemistry principles advocate reducing solvent use [13], few studies quantify the economic trade-offs of adopting bio-based alternatives in large-scale EOR applications. This review bridges that gap by synthesizing data across these domains.

Furthermore, regulatory bodies like the EPA identify these solvents as key VOC emitters [13], aligning with human health assessments under IMAP frameworks [9]. However, despite green chemistry principles advocating reduced use [13], quantitative data on economic trade-offs remains scarce.

Human health assessments under frameworks like IMAP reveal toxicity risks from prolonged exposure (9). Green chemistry principles advocate reducing solvent use, with bio-based options showing promise in lowering persistence (13). Specific lab-based studies on gas condensate solvents provide quantitative data on emissions and toxicity, as detailed below.

Environmental Impacts

Laboratory analyses reveal precise measurements of pollution from gas condensate-derived solvents, focusing on VOC emissions and ecotoxicity.

Air Pollution

Hydrocarbon solvents from gas condensate are potent VOC sources, evaporating during use and forming ground-level ozone and smog (11).

EOR applications, emissions include methane and NOx, intensifying climate change (12). Halogenated derivatives, if present, contribute to stratospheric ozone depletion. Evaporation experiments on coatings showed solvent-borne polyurethane emitting VOCs at a rate of 6.7 mg h⁻¹, with an emission factor of 495 g kg⁻¹, dominated by hydrocarbons (C₄–C₁₀) and aromatics like PCBTF (0.2% of VOC mass) . Water-borne latex paints had lower factors (43.1 g kg⁻¹), primarily oxygenates like ethanol and ethylene glycol (4).

Water Pollution. Spills and discharges contaminate aquatic environments, with hydrocarbons exhibiting toxicity to marine organisms (8). Produced water from oilfields, often treated with these solvents, introduces persistent pollutants if not remediated (13).

Acute toxicity tests on coral (Acropora tenuis) larvae exposed to condensate WAF showed IC50 for metamorphosis inhibition at 339 μg L⁻¹ TPAH (without UV) and 132 μg L⁻¹ (with UV), indicating 43% increased sensitivity under UV. Sponge (Rhopaloeides odorabile) larvae were less sensitive (>11,000 μg L⁻¹ TPAH) (3). WAF was 39-93 times more toxic than predicted from individual components (e.g., naphthalene IC50 ~80,000 μg L⁻¹).

Soil Pollution

Leaching into soil reduces microbial activity and fertility, with bioaccumulation affecting food chains (9). Table 1 summarizes key impacts, As shown in Table 1, water pollution presents the highest acute toxicity risk, with IC50 values dropping to 132 μg L⁻¹ under UV exposure, significantly lower than air emission thresholds.

Table 1.

Summary of Environmental Impacts with Lab Data

Impact Category

Pollutants Involved

Effects

Laboratory Examples

Air

VOCs, Methane, NOx

Ozone formation, Climate change

Emission rate 6.7 mg h⁻¹ from polyurethane

acp.copernicus.org

Water

Hydrocarbons, Aromatics

Toxicity to aquatic life, Groundwater contamination

IC50 132 μg L⁻¹ TPAH for coral with UV

nature.com

Soil

Persistent organics

Reduced fertility, Bioaccumulation

Condensate banking reduces permeability to <0.05

mdpi.com

 

Figure 1. Species-Specific Critical Target Lipid Body Burdens (CTLBB) from Laboratory Toxicity Tests on Weathered Gas Condensate (Data from Ref (2)).

 

Mitigation Methods

Laboratory-validated methods demonstrate effective reduction of impacts.

Green Solvents and Alternatives

Bio-based solvents like ethyl lactate and ionic liquids offer biodegradability and lower toxicity (15). In remediation, green solvents separate pollutants effectively. Experiments with natural gas condensate in ES-SAGD showed optimal 10% concentration improving bitumen recovery and reducing cSOR from 7.6 to 2.83, with potential GHG reductions (6).

Recovery and Remediation Technologies

Solvent recyclers reduce emissions by 80% via distillation and nanofiltration (13). Bioremediation combines biological and chemical methods for hydrocarbon cleanup. Thermochemical treatment (NH₄Cl + NaNO₂) recovered 65% condensate, reduced viscosity 17-fold (from 0.34 to 0.02 cP), improved gas permeability by 1.22-fold, and cut capillary pressure by 51% (from 65.5 to 32.4 psi) in core flood experiments (1).

Regulatory and Best Practices

Regulations like the Clean Air Act enforce emission controls. Best management practices include reduced emissions during drilling and water conservation. Figure 2 depicts a lifecycle approach to mitigation, based on experimental recovery data.

 

Figure 2. Lifecycle Emission Reduction Potential with Mitigation Strategies (Derived from Lab and Modeling Data, Refs. [10, 13])

 

Discussion

Laboratory-derived toxicity thresholds and experimental recovery tests reveal that while gas condensate solvents pose acute risks (e.g., low IC50 for corals), green alternatives and recovery technologies offer viable reductions. Challenges like cost and scalability persist, but integrating these yields dual environmental and economic benefits. Future research should focus on expanded life cycle assessments (LCAs) and additional tropical species testing to quantify impacts comprehensively (6). It is important to note that most toxicity data cited herein originate from controlled laboratory environments (closed experimental systems). While these provide precise IC50 values, they may not fully capture dynamic field conditions such as UV variability, water turbulence, and microbial interactions. Future studies should prioritize mesocosm experiments to validate these laboratory-derived thresholds in open environmental systems.

Conclusion

Gas condensate-derived solvents significantly environment by laboratory toxicity thresholds and emission data, but targeted mitigations—through alternatives, recovery, and regulations—can substantially reduce these effects. This aligns with global sustainability efforts, urging industries to adopt eco-friendly practices for long-term viability.

 

References:

  1. Hassan, A.M.; Mahmoud, M.A.; Al-Majed, A.A.; Al-Nakhli, A.R.; Bataweel, M.A.; Elkatatny, S. Mitigation of Condensate Banking Using Thermochemical Treatment: Experimental and Analytical Study. Energies 2019, 12(5), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050800.
  2. Negri, A.P., et al. Derivation of toxicity thresholds for gas condensate oils protective of tropical species using experimental and modelling approaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2021, 173, 112961. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X21009334.
  3. Negri, A. P. et al. Acute ecotoxicology of natural oil and gas condensate to coral reef larvae. Sci. Rep. 6, 21153 (2016). https://www.nature.com/articles/srep21153.
  4. Stockwell, C. E., et al. Volatile organic compound emissions from solvent- and water-borne coatings – compositional differences and tracer compound identifications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6005–6022 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6005-2021.
  5. Vidonish, J. E., et al. Thermal Treatment of Hydrocarbon-Impacted Soils: A Review of Technology Innovation for Sustainable Remediation. Engineering, 2(4), 426-437 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.012.
  6. Effectiveness of Natural Gas Condensate as a Viable Solvent in ES-SAGD Process: Experimental and Life Cycle Assessment Study. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 16, 15169–15181. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c01666.
  7. Solvent degradation and emissions from a CO2 capture pilot at a refinery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 434, 140054. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343723021504.
  8. Environmental Risks of Condensate Releases - Leviathan Offshore Project. 2018. https://homelandguards.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/2018-07-15-prof-richard-steiner-leviathan-project-environmental-risks.pdf.
  9. Sustainability and Chemicals. Conservation Wiki, 2023. https://www.conservation-wiki.com/wiki/Sustainability_and_Chemicals.
  10. Natural Gas Condensates: Human health tier II assessment. 2015. https://www.industrialchemicals.gov.au/sites/default/files/Natural%2520Gas%2520Condensates_Human%2520health%2520tier%2520II%2520assessment.pdf.
  11. IMPACT OF SOLVENTS LEADING TO ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Special Issue 3, 49-52. https://www.jchps.com/specialissues/Special%2520issue3/06%2520jchps%2520si3%2520nanni%252049-52.pdf.
  12. Why Industrial Solvents Are Bad for the Environment. 2023. https://solventwasher.com/why-industrial-solvents-are-bad-for-the-environment/.
  13. Solvents and sustainable chemistry. Proc. R. Soc. A, 2015, 471: 20150502. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4685879/.
  14. Gas Production from Gas Condensate Reservoirs Using Sustainable Green Chemicals: Impact of Gas Composition and Reservoir Properties. Sustainability, 2019, 11(10), 2838. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2838.
Информация об авторах

Basic Doctoral Student, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Uzbekistan, Tashkent

базовый докторант Ташкентского химико-технологического института, Узбекистан г. Ташкент

Basic Doctoral Student, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Uzbekistan, Tashkent

базовый докторант Ташкентского химико-технологического института, Узбекистан г. Ташкент

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Uzbekistan, Tashkent

д-р техн. наук, проф., проректор по академической деятельности Ташкентского химико-технологического института, Узбекистан, г. Ташкент

Журнал зарегистрирован Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор), регистрационный номер ЭЛ №ФС77-54434 от 17.06.2013
Учредитель журнала - ООО «МЦНО»
Главный редактор - Звездина Марина Юрьевна.
Top