Associate Professor, Tashkent State Technical University named after Islam Karimov, Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent
PROSPECT OF USING THE PYROLYSIS PROCESS TO PRODUCE HIGH-QUALITY LIQUID FUELS
ABSTRACT
The article studies the methods of obtaining solid, liquid and gaseous fuels by pyrolytic processes of secondary raw materials.
The prospects of using pyrocarbon-hydrocarbon mass of bio-plant origin as an energy source or their independent use as dry fuel briquettes, which is determined by environmental safety and improved performance characteristics, are discussed.
The results of calculating the equilibrium composition of torrefaction products and pyrolysis of absolutely dry (ADW) and wet wood, wood fuel pellets and carbon-containing solid municipal waste are presented depending on the main process conditions - temperature (T = 200-650 °C), pressure (p = 0.02-1.2 MPa) and the ratio of mass flow rates of the gas conversion agent (water vapor) and biomass.
АННОТАЦИЯ
В статье проведены исследования методов получения твердых, жидких и газообразных топлив методом пиролитических процессов вторичного сырья.
Обсуждена перспективность применения пироуглерод-углеводородной массы биорастительного происхождения в качестве энергоносителя или их самостоятельное использование в качестве сухих топливных брикетов которая определяется экологической безопасностью и улучшенными эксплуатационными характеристиками.
Приведены результаты расчетов равновесного состава продуктов торрефакции и пиролиза абсолютно сухой (АСД) и влажной древесины, древесных топливных гранул и углеродсодержащих твердых бытовых отходов в зависимости от основных режимных условий процесса – температуры (Т = 200–650оС), давления (р = 0,02–1,2 МПа) и соотношения массовых расходов газового агента конверсии (водяной пар) и биомассы.
Keywords: pyrolysis gas, pyrocarbon, hydrocarbon mass, biofuels, pyrocondensate, gasoline fraction, hydrolytic lignin, semi-finished raw material, torrefaction, hydrophobic, high-speed carbonization, granule.
Ключевые слова: пирогаз, пироуглерод, углеводородная масса, биотоплива, пироконденсат, бензиновой фракции, гидролизный лигнин, сырье-полуфабрикат, торрефакция, гидрофобный, скоростной карбонизации, гранула.
INTRODUCTION. In the Republic of Uzbekistan, the raw material for obtaining liquid, gaseous and solid energy carriers from bio-plant material is guzapoi - cotton stalks - the remainder after the main harvest, which practically does not contain sulfur-containing compounds. With an annual renewable potential of 50-70 million tons, in addition, the hydrocarbons obtained from guzapoi by pyrolysis mainly have a simple structural appearance, in contrast to the traditional fuels used, where the composition may contain largely polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons with a significant complex chemical structure. Biofuel of any consistency is considered one of the most promising renewable alternative fuels. The economically acceptable potential of renewable energy sources in the world is currently estimated at 20 billion tons of conventional fuel, which is twice the annual production of all types of organic fuel. The Republic has its own potential of bio-plant materials - cotton stems, which are renewable in October-November annually at least 50-70 million tons per year, which is equal to 0.562 108 tons of conventional fuel or it can be equal to 0.394 108 oil equivalent (energy is generated by burning 1 ton of cotton 16.3 109 J or 0.562 tons of conventional fuel).
Until now, this most valuable source of renewable energy is lost irretrievably on cotton plantations after the main harvest - raw cotton - has been collected. Only a small part of them is used by local residents as low-grade fuel, when their qualified processing can produce flammable pyrolysis gas for industrial and domestic needs and pyrocondensate, which has such a wide range of consumption as in the production of organic synthesis and energy sources, as well as pyrocarbon - a valuable semi-finished product for obtaining carbon adsorbents, which are indispensable for use in industrial areas, in particular as carbon electrodes. In modern conditions, liquid energy carriers consisting of carbon-hydrocarbon materials with a low content of oxygen-containing compounds, unlike the well-known solid energy carriers of natural origin, are highly valued and there is a great need. Therefore, it is considered expedient both in economic and environmental terms to obtain solid carbon-hydrocarbon energy materials from bio-plant materials or, as it is commonly called in many literary sources, from non-commercial wood. Energy-technological processing of this type of raw material is equivalent to the use of 0.25-0.5 kg of solid carbon-hydrocarbon fuel per kilogram of cotton stalks.
Taking into account the simultaneous production of bio-plant profile products, a qualified approach to the processing of this type of raw material by modern chemical processes makes it possible to obtain highly efficient energy materials.
Until recently, the fuel supply of consumers was based on flammable gas and liquid petroleum origin, the use of which for power plants was the most appropriate due to the relatively high concentration of energy per unit volume, ease of transportation, storage and operation, availability and low cost of production.
However, the growth dynamics of consumers of fuel and energy materials required the expansion of resources of environmentally friendly, solid transportable briquetted energy carriers with high energy efficiency values, which is due to the limited natural fuel reserves on the one hand and the constant increase in other technological difficulties in ensuring various economic, environmental, and generally strategic requirements of global significance on the other hand. The expansion of resources of solid multifaceted effective solid fuels can be achieved through the use of alternative, renewable resource raw materials in obtaining energy carriers for a specific purpose. The prospects of using pyrocarbon-hydrocarbon mass of bio-plant origin as an energy source or their independent use as dry fuel briquettes are determined, first of all, by their environmental safety and improved operational characteristics, and the sufficiency of raw material resources.
Solid pyrolysis products consist of the sum of pyrolytic carbon and residual hydrocarbon mass. The results of the experiment show that under certain conditions it is possible to obtain practically not less than 30% of the mass of the loaded raw material of solid carbon mass with traces of hydrocarbons from guzapoi by means of pyrolysis. Taking into account the annual renewal of this potential of more than 50-70 million tons, the research direction arouses interest in the development of works in this direction.
In order to more deeply study the process of pyrolytic destruction of guzapoi, we studied the effect of the process temperature on the qualitative and quantitative composition of the final products. Table No. 1 shows the results of the effect of pyrolytic destruction on the yield of pyrogas, pyrocondensate and solid residue. In this case, the temperature range of the pyrolysis process is selected from 475 to 800 ° C with a step of 25 °C. The data presented in the table show that at low temperatures of the process the yield of solid components is 35.70%, pyrocarbon 21.4% and pyrolysis hydrocarbon 14.30%, and the yield of pyrolysis gas is 11.44%. In this case, the pyrocondensate is obtained with a boiling range of 63-430 °C, which is a mixture of the head hydrocarbon fraction with a boiling range of 63-90 °C, 2.13% gasoline fraction with a boiling range of 90-1800 °C, yield 29.82%, and diesel fraction with a boiling range of 180-3500 °C, yield 10.10% and oil fraction with a boiling range of 351-4300 °C at a yield level of 7.90% of the potential possible. In this case, the losses are determined by the difference in the masses of the outputs and the load.
As can be seen from the table, the boiling range of the wide fraction (in oil refining, such a fraction is called WLFU - wide light fraction of hydrocarbons) is not constant, which is explained by an increase in the yield of lower molecular weight fractions of hydrocarbons with an increase in the process temperature. A similar picture can be seen with a change in the yield of pyrolysis gas. Indeed, with an increase in the process temperature, the yield of pyrolysis gas increases from the potential possible, which is reflected in the yield of pyrocondensate and solid residue of the pyrolysis process. A similar picture is observed with the oil fraction - one of the components of the wide light fraction of hydrocarbons. At a process temperature above 600 °C, the oil fraction is practically not formed and the pyrocondensate consists of a mixture of only gasoline and diesel fractions, if we do not take into account the head insignificant part from the potential, the yield of which also increases, and the chemical composition of the solid residue also changes both qualitatively and quantitatively. If at 475°C the yield of solid residue consisted of 21.40% carbon in the sum of 35.70 and 14.30% hydrocarbon, then at 6000°C the carbon content changed towards an increase and amounted to 23.17%, and the hydrocarbon content changed towards a decrease and amounted to a yield of 10.36% at 6000°C against 14.30% at 4750°C. Such a change in the qualitative and quantitative composition of the solid residue is explained by an increase in the depth of the slow pyrolysis-cooking process with a change in temperature towards an increase in the temperature of the pyrolysis process.
As can be seen from the table, the change in the mutual ratios in the yield of diesel and gasoline fractions is explained by the general pattern of increasing the degree of depth of thermal (pyrolytic) destruction of high-molecular complex organic structures with the formation of lower-molecular hydrocarbon substances.
Table 1.
Results of pyrolytic processing of cotton stems of fraction 3-5 mm with a mixture of heat carriers-packing, consisting of the corresponding fractions with a loading ratio of pyrolysis raw material - heat distribution packing of 2:1 without access of oxygen (air) to the reaction zone
|
№ |
Рyrolysis temperature, °C |
Pyrogaz, exit |
Рyrocondensate - wide fraction |
Pyrocarbon hydrocarbon |
Losses, in % |
||||||||||||
|
Вoiling range, °C |
Еxit |
Including by factions |
|||||||||||||||
|
Head, output |
Gasoline fraction, yield |
Diesel fraction, output |
Oil fraction, yield |
||||||||||||||
|
in,g |
in,% |
in,g |
in,% |
in,g |
in,% |
in,g |
in,% |
in,g |
in,% |
in,g |
in,% |
in,g |
in,% |
||||
|
1 |
475 |
114,4 |
11,44 |
63-430 |
499,5 |
49,95 |
21,3 |
2,13 |
298,2 |
29,82 |
101,0 |
10,10 |
79,0 |
7,90 |
357,0 |
35,70 |
2,91 |
|
2 |
500 |
143,6 |
14,36 |
61-429 |
461,7 |
46,17 |
28,3 |
2,83 |
270,1 |
27,01 |
100,0 |
10,00 |
63,3 |
6,33 |
359,0 |
35,90 |
3,57 |
|
3 |
525 |
182,2 |
18,22 |
60-420 |
434,4 |
43,44 |
30,7 |
3,07 |
253,6 |
25,36 |
91,3 |
9,13 |
59,2 |
5,92 |
347,5 |
34,75 |
3,59 |
|
4 |
550 |
195,7 |
19,57 |
57-418 |
414,8 |
41,48 |
46,6 |
4,66 |
225,8 |
22,58 |
89,2 |
8,92 |
59,2 |
5,92 |
347,2 |
34,72 |
4,23 |
|
5 |
575 |
227,6 |
22,76 |
56-414 |
391,7 |
39,17 |
48,7 |
4,87 |
160,3 |
16,03 |
71,8 |
7,18 |
50,0 |
5,00 |
331,5 |
33,15 |
4,92 |
|
6 |
600 |
255,4 |
25,54 |
50-409 |
372,4 |
37,24 |
51,8 |
5,18 |
150,9 |
15,09 |
66,1 |
6,61 |
31,7 |
3,17 |
335,1 |
33,51 |
3,71 |
|
7 |
625 |
281,5 |
28,15 |
44-382 |
352,2 |
35,22 |
60,0 |
6,00 |
160,9 |
16,09 |
41,0 |
4,10 |
- |
- |
327,1 |
32,71 |
3,92 |
|
8 |
650 |
289,9 |
28,99 |
41-367 |
338,7 |
33,87 |
63,4 |
6,34 |
150,4 |
15,04 |
40,1 |
4,01 |
- |
- |
324,8 |
32,48 |
4,66 |
|
9 |
675 |
336,2 |
33,62 |
38-355 |
310,9 |
31,09 |
79,1 |
7,91 |
117,2 |
11,72 |
40,0 |
4,00 |
- |
- |
314,6 |
31,46 |
3,83 |
|
10 |
700 |
363,5 |
36,35 |
36-346 |
279,1 |
27,91 |
81,8 |
8,18 |
90,7 |
9,07 |
39,5 |
3,95 |
- |
- |
317,2 |
31,72 |
4,02 |
|
11 |
725 |
405,4 |
40,54 |
36-340 |
250,0 |
25,00 |
86,3 |
8,63 |
75,4 |
7,54 |
38,0 |
3,80 |
- |
- |
302,8 |
30,28 |
4,18 |
|
12 |
750 |
435,4 |
43,54 |
36-333 |
225,3 |
22,53 |
93,4 |
9,34 |
96,8 |
9,68 |
35,1 |
3,51 |
- |
- |
293,0 |
29,30 |
4,63 |
|
13 |
775 |
495,9 |
49,59 |
36-327 |
204,7 |
20,47 |
96,0 |
9,60 |
78,7 |
7,87 |
30,0 |
3,00 |
- |
- |
261,7 |
26,17 |
3,77 |
|
14 |
800 |
517,0 |
51,70 |
36-316 |
183,1 |
18,31 |
98,1 |
9,81 |
63,7 |
6,37 |
21,3 |
2,13 |
- |
- |
261,1 |
26,11 |
3,88 |
However, the formation of oxygen-containing compounds with traces of the formation of hydrocarbon compounds with the presence of nitrogen or other elements in the structure is not excluded. It is evident that with a change in the pyrolysis temperature from 600 °C to 800 °C, the yield of the gasoline fraction in the composition of a wide fraction of hydrocarbons (from the potential possible) changes from 15.09 % to 6.37 % and the content of the diesel fraction also decreases. We call this process of pyrolysis conditionally pyrolysis without access of air or oxygen to the reaction zone, although in the reactor working capacity of 6 liters the free space from loading of raw materials of pyrolysis - geometrically fractions of cotton stems was occupied by air, which in terms of this air volume - 4 liters to oxygen is - 1 liter or 0.2 g-mol. It should be noted that although in the tables for drawing up the balance the yield of pyrolysis gas is presented in mass fractions. This mass value is calculated, and during the experiment the yield of gaseous products of pyrolysis are determined by volume.
In order to find the optimal process parameters to ensure the maximum yield of light hydrocarbon fractions, studies and experiments were continued under various conditions of the pyrolysis process. It is known that one of the most widely used in chemical, petrochemical and biochemical technology is pyrolysis with partial oxidation. In this case, in a pyrolytic reactor, oxygen supplied to the zone of thermal destruction of high-molecular compounds partially oxidizes some compounds. In this case, the so-called oxidative destruction occurs with the release of a certain amount of heat due to oxidative processes, which is advisable to ensure the maximum degree of destruction of high-molecular complex structures, because when using, therefore, pyrolytic processes often turn to oxidative pyrolysis. In our case, we limited ourselves to connecting the air flow to the reaction zone at a rate of 10 l / 10 min in order to prevent complete oxidation of the pyrolysis raw materials. However, we were unable to determine the amount of gas formations, since at the outlet of the gas mixtures we had a mixture of air with pyrolysis gas. Therefore, we limited ourselves to presenting them with the formation by summing up the gas formations with losses. However, it should be noted that the resulting gas mixture burned with a bright blue flame on the torch. As can be seen from Tables 1 and 2, the results of oxidative pyrolysis allow changing the boiling range of the liquid fraction. It is evident that the beginning of boiling of liquid fractions at a process temperature of 475 °C in the case of using oxidative pyrolysis increases by several points, and the end of boiling decreases by 12 points, against during pyrolysis without oxygen access to the reaction zone.
Changes in the boiling range of the liquid fraction are also observed when carrying out pyrolytic destruction at 800 °C. If in the case of conventional pyrolysis the onset of boiling of the liquid fraction is noted at 36 °C, then in the case of oxidative pyrolysis, the temperature of the onset of boiling of the liquid product rose by 3 points higher and had a value of 49 °C, and at the same time the value of the end of boiling of the pyrocondensate also rose from 316 °C to 348 °C, which we explain by the formation of oxygen-containing hydrocarbons with significantly increased boiling point values. Changes in the yields of liquid fractions and solid residue are also observed. The indicators of the head part of liquid hydrocarbons also changed. It is noteworthy that, in this case, a significant increase in the yield of the light fraction of the pyrocondensate is observed. However, at high temperatures, the yield of the solid part also increases and is 29% versus 26% during pyrolysis without combining partial oxidation processes. This phenomenon is explained by an increase in the slow cooking process versus the thermal destruction process. The possibility of the influence of a certain part of the high-molecular hydrocarbon part on the process cannot be ruled out.
The difference in the reduction of the yield of solid residue in contrast to the simple slow pyrolysis process and pyrolysis with partial oxidation is that, apparently, in the previous cases, the slow pyrolysis process first proceeds with the formation of higher molecular weight hydrocarbons and then thermal dehydrogenation, ensuring the formation of pyrocarbon.
According to optimistic forecasts, hydrocarbons of biological origin will become the only source of energy and energy carriers for humanity, replacing all others. Therefore, at the initial stage of using pyrocarbon of biological origin, we considered it expedient to use hydrocarbons of biological origin in a certain ratio in the process of obtaining solid carbon-hydrocarbon fuel.
In world practice, numerous technologies of physical and thermochemical conversion of biomass for the purpose of obtaining energy or valuable secondary energy sources and products (syngas, biogas; synthetic liquid fuels - biodiesel, bioethanol; solid biochars, sorbents and carbon nanomaterials) have been mastered or are at the stage of research and demonstration projects [1].
Of particular interest is the development of innovative technologies for the thermochemical conversion of plant biomass and carbon-containing waste to obtain high-quality secondary fuels of gaseous, liquid and solid consistency, with low ash content and high calorific value and competitive medium-calorific and high-calorific fuel.
The use of the pyrolysis process, which allows, depending on the conditions, to obtain high-quality liquid fuel, is promising.
The latter could be effectively used for co-combustion with local low-grade brown coals, for example, in fluidized bed furnaces. Existing biomass pyrolysis plants are characterized by low productivity and efficiency. In addition to direct use as boiler and household fuel, wood fuel pellets (WFP) and wood fuel briquettes (WFB) are also of interest as a semi-finished raw material for further thermochemical conversion to produce generator gas and charcoal.
Various carbon-containing wastes are increasingly used as alternative renewable raw materials for pyrolysis and gasification processes: the organic part of municipal solid waste (MSW), solid sewage sludge (SSW), hydrolytic lignin (HL), etc. This type of raw material is characterized by "negative cost", since it requires considerable costs for management and disposal. The production of secondary biofuel from it simultaneously solves this problem.
Optimization of existing and development of new methods and devices for thermochemical processing of wood and waste require a deep understanding of the mechanisms and patterns of conversion processes and their relationship with operating conditions and the composition of raw materials.
Let us dwell on two types of thermochemical conversion. Torrefaction (roasting) of wood fuel is a process of its soft pyrolysis at a relatively low temperature (200–350°C), the purpose of which is to increase the calorific value by removing moisture and decomposing highly reactive components of organic matter, mainly hemicellulose, which have a relatively low energy value [2, 3]. Technologically, the torrefaction process can be carried out.
- in a windproof stationary layer, for example, on a hot tray;
- in an infiltrated moving layer, for example, on a conveyor belt, in the environment of “juice” water vapor released from the processed raw material at the preliminary stage of drying or in a screw conveyor;
- in a fluidized bed using water vapor (including "juice"), combustion products of part of the original biomass or gaseous products of its torrefaction as a fluidizing agent.
The organization of the circulation of the steam-gas mixture in a closed circuit between the zones of drying, pyrolysis and cooling of raw materials in combination with the regeneration of the combustion heat of pyrolytic gases allows the implementation of energy-saving environmentally friendly torrefaction schemes. The main product is solid torrefied wood ("gray" biocoal) - hydrophobic, resistant to decay, highly reactive semi-coke with a moisture content of 0.1-5%, ash content of ~1%, a relatively low content of fixed carbon of 35-40% and a combustion heat of up to 21 MJ/kg. A promising gaseous torrefaction agent is carbon dioxide CO2, the use of which in a closed cycle with the utilization of excess amounts allows reducing emissions of this greenhouse gas into the atmosphere.
Unlike torrefied wood, which contains a significant amount of residual volatile mass elements (hydrogen, oxygen), biochar consists mainly of solid fixed carbon. Biomass pyrolysis occurs at higher temperatures (350–650 °C) and is a process of thermal decomposition of organic matter without oxygen access to form condensable (resins, H2O) and non-condensable gases (H2, CO, CH4, CO2), as well as a solid product – biochar (in particular, charcoal), the ratio between which is a function of temperature, pressure and raw material heating rate.
During charcoal production, slow pyrolysis of large pieces and trunks of wood is carried out at heating rates of 5–7 K/min. The duration of the charcoal combustion cycle ranges from 8–12 hours in small mobile furnaces with a retort volume of 4–10 m3 to 7–14 days in concrete stationary furnaces with a working volume of hundreds of cubic meters [3, 4]. The mass yield of coal is 20–33%. In the world, similar equipment produces from 26 to 100 million tons of charcoal per year with a growth trend of about 3% per year. The maximum yield of biochar, close to thermodynamic equilibrium, with a significantly shorter process duration was obtained by the method of "rapid carbonization" at elevated pressure (up to 0.5–1.5 MPa) at the University of Hawaii (USA) [4, 5].
At the same time, the role of increasing pressure remains unclear, since theoretically its effect under these parameters should not be significant.
CONCLUSION
This paper presents the results of calculations of the equilibrium composition of torrefaction and pyrolysis products of absolutely dry (ADW) and wet wood, wood fuel pellets and carbonaceous municipal solid waste depending on the main process conditions - temperature (T = 200-650 °C), pressure (p = 0.02-1.2 MPa) and the ratio of mass flow rates of the gas conversion agent (water vapor) and biomass. The calculations were performed using the NASA CEA program by the Gibbs energy minimization method for an equilibrium mixture of gas and condensed components [6]. The calculated raw materials are coniferous wood and wood fuel pellets, municipal solid waste and granules based on them, solid sewage sludge and hydrolytic lignin, the composition and effective molecular formulas of the combustible mass of which are given in Table 1 (low nitrogen and sulfur contents were not taken into account in the calculations). The moisture content of wood and waste varied within the range of 0–60%, with the exception of wood pellets and household waste, the moisture content of which was taken as constant and equal to 8%.
References:
- Prins M. J. Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification and torrefaction. Doctoral Thesis. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. — 2005.
- Bioenergetics – hydrogen or carbon? / V. A. Borodulya, G. I. Palchenok, L. M. Vinogradov, et al. // V Minsk International Forum on Heat and Mass Transfer. — Minsk, 2004. — Report 6-03. — 9 p.
- Yoshida T., Antal M. J. Sewage Sludge Carbonization for Terra Preta Applications / Energy Fuels, 2009. Vol. 23. — P. 5454–5459.
- Gordon S., McBride B. J. Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications // NASA reference publication 1311, 1994.
- Borodulya A.V., Palchenok G.I. Prospects of application and methods of calculation of combustion of natural and densified biofuel in a fluidized bed / Bulletin of the NAS of Belarus. Series of physical and technical sciences. - 2003. - No. 3. - P. 116-123.
- Badriddinova F.M., Mamatov S., Safayev M.M., Tillabayev Sh.G., Rizayev T. Technology of obtaining gaseous and liquid energy carriers by the method of thermocontact pyrolysis of secondary materials of household and industrial origin. Actual issues in the field of technical and socio-economic sciences. Republican interuniversity collection. part –II, Tashkent-2014, pp.35-36.
- M. M. Safayev, S. M. Turobzhonov. Obtaining compound gasoline. Bulletin of Tashkent State Technical University. 2013, No. 1, pp. 119-123.
- Saidakhmedov Sh. M. Development of technologies for the production of lubricating oils in Uzbekistan. - Tashkent: FAN, 2004. - 108 p.
- Khaitov R. R. Chromatographic analysis of aromatic hydrocarbons of gasoline // Uzb. chemical journal. - Tashkent, 2010. - No. 3. - P. 71-73.
- Khaitov R. R., Khamidov B. N., Narmetova G. R. Aromatic hydrocarbons of gasoline // Uzb. chemical journal. – Tashkent, 2011. – № 1. – P. 31-33.
- Narmetova G.R. Colloidal and chemical bases of creation of polyphase sorbents for gas-liquid-solid-phase chromatography: Abstract of author's dis. of doctor of chemical sciences. – Tashkent, 1993. – 38 p.
- Adylova T.T. Improving antiknock properties of Fergana gasolines by denormalization of them with seolites // Collection of Adsorption properties of natural and synthetic sorbents. – Tashkent: FAN, 1969. – P. 185-189.
- Gutyrya V.S., Fadeicheva A.G., Dryachileva R.I., Loktionova R.A. Aromatic hydrocarbons in gasoline fractions of Dolinskie and Bitkovskaya oils of the Ukrainian SSR // In the Rep. Interdepartmental. Collection. Oil refining and petrochemistry. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1965. Pp. 43-53.
- Rashidova F.M., Narmetova G.R. Improving the antiknock properties of Mingbulak gasoline // Uzb. chemical journal, 1997. - No. 3. - Pp. 56-58.
- Talismanov E.L., Trofimova O.V., Smirnov V.K., Irisova K.N. Obtaining diesel fuel components with ultra-low sulfur content under conditions of domestic oil refineries // Oil refining and petrochemistry. - 2004. - No. 11. - Pp. 13-16.