USING KAFKA IN FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ KAFKA В СИСТЕМАХ ФИНАНСОВОЙ ОБРАБОТКИ ДАННЫХ: ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА И ВЫЗОВЫ
Bolgov S.
Цитировать:
Bolgov S. USING KAFKA IN FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES // Universum: технические науки : электрон. научн. журн. 2025. 2(131). URL: https://7universum.com/ru/tech/archive/item/19348 (дата обращения: 19.04.2025).
Прочитать статью:

 

ABSTRACT

Apache Kafka is one of the leading technologies for streaming data processing, widely used in the financial sector. It provides high performance, scalability, and reliability for transaction processing, risk management, and fraud detection. This article explores the key benefits of Kafka in financial systems, such as high throughput and guaranteed message delivery, as well as major challenges, including integration complexity, fault tolerance management, and regulatory compliance. Strategies for overcoming these difficulties and the prospects for further adoption of Kafka in financial applications are analyzed.

АННОТАЦИЯ

Apache Kafka является одной из ведущих технологий для потоковой обработки данных, широко применяемой в финансовом секторе. Она обеспечивает высокую производительность, масштабируемость и надежность при обработке транзакций, управлении рисками и выявлении мошенничества. В статье рассматриваются основные преимущества Kafka в финансовых системах, такие как высокая пропускная способность и гарантированная доставка сообщений, а также ключевые вызовы, включая сложность интеграции, управление отказоустойчивостью и соблюдение регуляторных требований. Анализируются стратегии преодоления этих трудностей и перспективы дальнейшего применения Kafka в финансовой сфере.

 

Keywords: Apache Kafka, financial data, stream processing, scalability, reliability, integration.

Ключевые слова: Apache Kafka, финансовые данные, потоковая обработка, масштабируемость, надежность, интеграция.

 

Introduction

Modern financial systems make very high demands on real-time data processing. Growing volumes of information very fast, claims of high speed and reliability, and the need to follow strict regulatory standards have gradually made traditional technologies stop coping. The emergence of streaming platforms like Apache Kafka turned into a response to challenges which relate to the processing of big volumes of data in real time without delays and with guaranteed delivery.

From an initial concept of a high-throughput message log system, Kafka has grown into a high-powered streaming data processing platform. Architecture-wise, it is designed for horizontal scalability, fault tolerance, and it can handle millions of events per second. Such a combination of characteristics makes Kafka fit particularly for the financial sector, where transactions, algorithmic trading, risk management, and fraud detection require high performance and reliability.

While the adoption of Kafka in the financial industry has been very useful, it comes with a set of challenges that one needs to get around. Among them: data consistency is guaranteed, integration with legacy systems, and also answering strict requirements about security and regulation matters.

The current paper is designed to discuss Kafka's scalability and reliability in financial systems, develop several architectural approaches that could provide high performance, and indicate the main challenges that may be faced by organizations during the implementation of this technology.

Main part. Scalability of Kafka in financial systems

One of the main factors defining Apache Kafka as attractive for use in financial systems is its scalability. It is important to make sure of high performance when volumes of data generated in real time can reach billions of messages per second and, besides, a possibility of horizontal system expansion without serious losses in performance. By its very architecture, Kafka is optimized for such volumes of data and can easily scale at both the individual node and cluster level.

Kafka is designed to scale by partitioning data. Each message will be written to a topic and also to a partition within that topic, enabling the treatment of multiple streams of data parallel to each other (fig. 1).

 

Figure 1. Kafka partitioning visual representation [1]

 

This structure provides significant advantages in distributed systems, where each broker can process data independently of the others. This ensures low latency and high throughput. In financial applications such as real stock market trading or transaction processing, Kafka’s ability to process millions of transactions per second with minimal latency is critical.

To scale more efficiently, Kafka uses load balancing between brokers. When new brokers are added to a cluster, Kafka automatically redistributes data between nodes, which helps evenly distribute the load and prevent individual parts of the system from becoming overloaded. This is especially important for financial applications, where data growth is not uncommon and it is necessary to maintain stable system operation without losing performance.

The use of Kafka in financial systems requires special attention to the intricacies of tuning and performance optimization. In particular, it is necessary to properly tune the latency parameters and message processing to minimize the response time when processing financial transactions. These aspects should be given attention when designing the system so that it can cope with dynamically changing market conditions and guarantee high performance under any load [2].

However, using Kafka in scalable financial applications comes with a number of challenges, such as increased complexity in cluster management and the need to adapt to the specifics of existing regulations. It is important that organizations using Kafka consider these aspects when designing and implementing the solution in real production processes.

Reliability and fault tolerance: practical application of Apache Kafka in financial systems

One of the fundamental mechanisms of Kafka reliability is data replication [3]. Unlike many other systems, Kafka supports the ability to configure replication for each partition of a topic, which allows for multiple copies of data to be created on different brokers. One interesting use case for Kafka replication can be found in mobile applications, such as Android applications, which process large amounts of data in real time [4]. Consider an application for monitoring user activity in real time, where each user generates events (e.g. clicks, page views, etc.) that are sent to Kafka for processing and analytics. Data replication in Kafka ensures that all user-related events are reliably stored and can be restored if one of the servers or brokers fails. In such a case, the Android application will continue to receive up-to-date data forwarded to the remaining replicas, ensuring uninterrupted operation and minimizing possible data loss.

To ensure data integrity, Kafka uses an acknowledgement mechanism that ensures that a message is not considered delivered until it is written to all replicas when configured for maximum reliability. This minimizes the risk of data loss, but it requires additional resources and can increase latency, which must be taken into account when configuring financial applications. In most cases, financial systems require a high degree of reliability, where the «acks=all» acknowledgement mode is considered optimal, as it ensures that data is written to all replicas before it is considered to have reached the consumer.

However, the presence of replication and confirmations does not eliminate the need for monitoring and maintenance of the system. The complexity of managing fault tolerance in Kafka is that for the cluster to function correctly, it is necessary to carefully monitor the state of brokers, load balancing, and the state of replicas. Using monitoring tools (for example, Prometheus and Grafana) allows you to track cluster performance and quickly respond to possible failures. Regular failover testing helps to assess the real fault tolerance and readiness of the system for emergencies [5].

Additionally, to ensure data consistency in the event of failures, Kafka uses mechanisms such as log compaction, which eliminate duplicate messages and ensure that only the most relevant data is stored in the system. This is important for financial applications where the accuracy and consistency of information is critical.

While Kafka has some positive qualities for providing fault tolerance, it is important to remember that the reliability of the system depends on many factors, including hardware, network settings, and the frequency of recovery tests.

Delivery guarantees and data consistency

Some of the central aspects of Apache Kafka in financial systems include ensuring guaranteed message delivery and maintaining consistency of data-a property of a system in which the data is always in a valid and predictable state, in compliance with pre-defined rules and constraints. These problems are crucial for financial applications because even short-time losses or duplication of data might result in great financial and reputational risks. Kafka provides a few levels of guarantees concerning delivering messages, which include configuration for when reliability and/or performance is important.

Kafka supports three main levels of guarantees for message delivery: at most once, at least once, and exactly once. The first level-at most once-assumes that the messages can be lost in case of some problems with delivery. This can be acceptable in applications where data loss is not critical. The second level, at least once, ensures that each message will be delivered, although it may be re-delivered if any failure happens. It's commonly used in applications where ensuring message delivery is necessary but re-processing of messages doesn't pose any serious problem. Exactly once is the highest guarantee of delivery whereby each message is delivered only once, thus no duplication or data loss occurs. This level is preferred in financial systems where duplication or loss of data may lead to very serious consequences [6].

Kafka ensures data consistency through replication, message ordering, and delivery confirmation. Replication between brokers ensures data integrity even if nodes fail, and message ordering within partitions preserves their sequence, which is critical for financial transactions. To improve reliability, Kafka supports delivery confirmation: a message is considered received only after it is written to all replicas. This reduces the risk of loss, but can increase processing delays.

However, in distributed systems, full consistency is difficult. Therefore, when designing financial solutions, it is important to balance reliability, performance, and business requirements.

Challenges and prospects of using Apache Kafka

Implementing Apache Kafka into financial systems is a powerful solution for processing streaming data, but it comes with a number of significant challenges that must be overcome for successful integration and operation. These include difficulties in integrating with legacy systems, managing performance, and meeting regulatory requirements.

The first and most important challenge is integrating Kafka with existing systems in financial institutions. Many financial institutions still use monolithic architectures and legacy systems that are difficult to adapt to the new streaming data processing model. Kafka, being a distributed system, requires significant changes to the infrastructure, such as ensuring compatibility with other databases, as well as setting up interactions with internal and external services [7]. Migrating from older technologies to Kafka can be an expensive and time-consuming process that requires careful design of the architecture and testing of interactions.

Another major challenge is managing performance as data volumes increase. Despite Kafka’s high throughput, organizations face the challenge of maintaining optimal performance as workloads increase. This is especially true in financial systems, where high transaction throughput is critical. Systems using Kafka require careful tuning of parameters such as partition size, replication frequency, and producer and consumer configuration. Misconfiguration can lead to increased cluster load and increased latency, which will negatively impact the performance of the entire system.

Regulatory compliance is another challenge that financial institutions face when implementing Kafka. In the context of strict regulations such as HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) or CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act), it is necessary to ensure not only the reliability of data, but also its full tracking and auditability (table 1).

Table 1.

Key risks in data management and their mitigation strategies

Risk

Description

Mitigation methods

Data breach

Loss or unauthorized access to confidential information.

Data encryption; access control;multi-factor authentication.

System failure

Sudden system shutdown or loss of access.

Data replication;

backups; backup servers.

Data integrity violation

Incorrect modification or corruption of data.

Checksums; integrity checks at each processing stage.

System attacks (eg, DDOS)

Attacks aimed at overloading and denying service.

Traffic filtering;

intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS).

Inefficient data processing

Errors or delays in processing large data volumes.

Algorithm optimization; use of scalable architectures (eg, microservices).

User errors

Incorrect use of the system or data.

User training; intuitive interface; logging and monitoring user actions.

 

Kafka as a distributed system requires additional attention to security, encryption, and logging. To meet data storage and reporting requirements, it is necessary to develop additional mechanisms, such as audit tracking mechanisms and data access control at the broker and topic level, as well as to consider risks and their mitigation methods [8].

Despite the challenges, Kafka offers significant potential for financial systems. Integration with AI and ML allows for real-time data analysis, pattern detection, and faster decision making, which is already being used in algorithmic trading and risk management.

The development of hybrid cloud infrastructures expands Kafka’s capabilities in finance. Integration with cloud platforms provides flexibility, scalability, and data availability. In the future, Kafka can become part of financial ecosystems, including blockchain, to increase the transparency and security of transactions.

Conclusion

Apache Kafka has proven itself as a powerful and efficient streaming data processing platform capable of meeting the demanding requirements of the financial industry. Its scalability, fault tolerance, and flexible guaranteed delivery mechanisms make it an indispensable tool for working with transactions, algorithmic trading, risk management, and fraud detection.

However, implementing Kafka comes with a number of challenges, including the complexity of integrating with legacy systems, managing high loads, and the need to comply with strict regulatory requirements. Addressing these issues requires careful infrastructure setup, monitoring tools, and robust security mechanisms.

Despite these challenges, Kafka's potential in financial systems remains significant. Companies that invest in proper architecture and optimization gain a high-performance, scalable, and reliable platform for processing mission-critical data in real time, which helps improve business efficiency and competitiveness.

 

References:

  1. Topics, Partitions, and Offsets in Apache Kafka / Geeks for Geeks // URL:https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/topics-partitions-and-offsets-in-apache-kafka/ (date of application: 23.12.2024).
  2. Sidorov D. Analysis of strategies for mobile optimization in frontend development // German International Journal of Modern Science. 2024. No. 92. P. 110-112. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14181578 EDN: CKNPKW
  3. Elshoubary E. Studying the Efficiency of the Apache Kafka System Using the Reduction Method, and Its Effectiveness in Terms of Reliability Metrics Subject to a Copula Approach. // Applied Sciences. 2024. Vol. 14. P. 6758. DOI: 10.3390/app14156758 EDN: HFDOCV
  4. Ponomarev E. Optimizing android application performance: modern methods and practices // Sciences of Europe. 2024. No. 149. P. 62-64. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13842728 EDN: METXEJ
  5. Khaleel S. Slicify: Fault Injection Testing for Network Partitions. // In 2024 32nd International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), 2024. IEEE. P. 1-8. DOI: 10.1109/MASCOTS64422.2024.10786337
  6. Dharmapuram S. Enhanced data reliability and integrity in distributed systems using apache kafka and spark. 2024.
  7. Narayanan P. Engineering Real-time Data Pipelines using Apache Kafka. // In Data Engineering for Machine Learning Pipelines: From Python Libraries to ML Pipelines and Cloud Platforms. 2024. P. 277-322. DOI: 10.1007/979-8-8688-0602-5_9
  8. Yakovishin A., Kuznetsov I., Drozdov I., Pismensky D. Prospects for the Development of Information Security: Global Challenges and Defense Strategies // Information Resources of Russia. 2024. No. 2(197). P. 93-103. DOI: 10.52815/0204-3653_2024_2197_93 EDN: YIDGNR
Информация об авторах

Specialist degree, Murmansk Arctic University, Russia, Murmansk

специалист, Мурманский Арктический Университет, РФ, Мурманск

Журнал зарегистрирован Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор), регистрационный номер ЭЛ №ФС77-54434 от 17.06.2013
Учредитель журнала - ООО «МЦНО»
Главный редактор - Звездина Марина Юрьевна.
Top