MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF THE ACCEPTABLE PARAMETERS OF THE PLATE SCRUBBER

МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОЕ МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЕ ПРИЕМЛЕМЫХ ПАРАМЕТРОВ ПЛАСТИНЧАТОГО СКРУББЕРА
Цитировать:
Tojiev R., Sulaymanov A., Usmonov U. MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF THE ACCEPTABLE PARAMETERS OF THE PLATE SCRUBBER // Universum: технические науки : электрон. научн. журн. 2024. 1(118). URL: https://7universum.com/ru/tech/archive/item/16663 (дата обращения: 18.12.2024).
Прочитать статью:
DOI - 10.32743/UniTech.2024.118.1.16663

 

ABSTRACT

In the article, the influence of the hydraulic resistance of the plate scrubber, which cleans dusty gases in a wet method, on the cleaning efficiency and the energy used for the process was studied, and the optimal parameters of the device were determined using the mathematical planning method. Assuming that the influence of factors on the evaluation criteria in the mathematical planning method is fully described by a second-order polynomial, experiments (V4) are implemented based on the plan. Regression equations that adequately represent the evaluation criteria are HARTLI, with appropriate processing of the experimental results based on the -4 program. Based on the results of the experiment, the optimal parameters of the apparatus for the dust removal process selected for the sample are set to the standard state.

АННОТАЦИЯ

В статье исследовано влияние гидравлического сопротивления пластинчатого скруббера, очищающего запыленные газы мокрым способом, на эффективность очистки и энергозатраты на процесс, а также определены оптимальные параметры устройства с помощью математического уравнения. метод планирования. Полагая, что влияние факторов на критерии оценки в методе математического планирования полностью описывается полиномом второго порядка, эксперименты (V4) реализуются на основе плана. Уравнения регрессии, адекватно представляющие критерии оценки, представляют собой HARTLI с соответствующей обработкой экспериментальных результатов на основе программы -4. По результатам эксперимента оптимальные параметры аппарата процесса обеспыливания, выбранные для образца, устанавливаются в штатное состояние.

 

Keywords: plate scrubber, plate, HARTLI-4, wet method, hydraulic resistance, superphosphate dust, local resistance coefficient, working surface, nozzle

Ключевые слова: скруббер пластинчатый, пластина, ХАРТЛИ-4, мокрый способ, гидравлическое сопротивление, пыль суперфосфата, коэффициент местного сопротивления, рабочая поверхность, насадка.

 

Introduction

The cleaning efficiency of wet dust gas cleaning devices and the energy used for the process are determined according to the constructional structure of the device. One of the main tasks of the scientific research conducted in this field is to increase the cleaning efficiency and reduce the energy consumption per unit volume of the apparatus.

On the basis of these tasks, many scientific research works and information presented in the literature [1,2,3,4,5,7] were systematically analyzed on the basis of the MatLab program, and on the basis of these, an improved design scheme of the scrubber with a cylindrical plate with a simple structure and low energy consumption was developed, and a physical model of the device was developed (Fig. 1) [14,15]. Hydraulic resistance, the effect of hydraulic resistance on energy consumption and cleaning efficiency were studied in the experimental apparatus. In determining the cleaning efficiency and energy consumption, the equations proposed in the research work of KTSemrau [2,7] were used.

 

Figure 1. Overview of the laboratory model

 

During the experiments, within the following limits of the variable factors, the diameter of the liquid nozzle dn=3 mm, the liquid consumption Qliq=0.071÷0.189 m3/h, the intermediate step increased by 0.021 m3/h, the diameter of the plate valve hole df=2, 3 and 4 mm, the plate valve installation angle to the device β=15o; The number of 30o and 45o plates is 2 according to the angle of installation, the intermediate step was increased by an average of 5.5 m/s to the gas speed υг=7.4÷28.8 m/s.

Superphosphate mineral fertilizer dust was selected as dust gas, and its density was determined as ρг=3.38 kg/m3 for a mixture of air and superphosphate mineral fertilizer dust (in which the amount of gas and dust mixture is 2697.79 mgr [2,8,14] in 1 m3 of air). Taking into account the influence of the external environment during the experiments, the temperature for the water and gas system was set at 200С±2. Experiments RD 34.20. 519-97 “Испытания гидравлического сопротивления трубороводов. Машины и аппараты для измерения расхода газов и давления. Программа и методы испытаний” [2,6,9,10,11,12]. The results of the experiment are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Taking into account the multifactor nature of the conducted experiments, the results obtained for the minimum and maximum gas velocities are presented in the tables.

Table 1.

Experimental results obtained on the effect of hydraulic resistance on cleaning efficiency and energy consumption. Vgas=7.4 m/s const.

Vgas m/s

Qliq m3/hour

Plate Ø4, φ = 15°

Plate Ø3, φ = 15°

Plate Ø2, φ = 15°

ΔPcb,

Pa

KSP,

W

η, %

ΔPcb,Pa

KSP,W

η, %

ΔPcb, Pa

KSP, W

η, %

7.4

0.071

272

65.2

39.4

282

69.1

39.62

312

79.7

40.04

0.08

285

65.44

39,49

294

69.3

39.64

325

79.9

40.05

0.13

300

65.7

39.5

310

69.6

39.65

340

80.2

40.06

0.147

313

65.9

39.51

322

69.8

39.66

352

80.4

40.07

0.168

323

66.1

39.52

332

70

39.67

362

80.7

40.08

0.189

335

66.4

39.53

345

70.3

39.68

372

80.9

40.09

 

 

Plate Ø4, φ = 30°

Plate Ø3, φ = 30°

Plate Ø2, φ = 30°

7.4

0.071

198

47.7

38.8

205

50.5

38.9

227

58.3

39.2

0.08

208

47.9

38.81

215

50.7

38.92

237

58.5

39,22

0.13

219

48.1

38.82

226

51

38.93

248

58.8

39,23

0.147

228

48.4

38.83

235

51.2

38.94

257

59

39,24

0.168

235

48.6

38.84

242

51.4

38.95

264

59.2

39.25

0.189

245

48.8

38.85

252

51.6

38.96

253

59.4

39,26

 

 

Plate Ø4, φ = 45°

Plate Ø3, φ = 45°

Plate Ø2, φ = 45°

7.4

0.071

177

42.3

38.6

184

45.1

38.7

203

52.1

38.97

0.08

185

42.6

38.61

192

45.3

38.71

212

52.3

38.98

0.13

195

42.8

38.62

202

45.5

38.72

221

52.5

38.99

0.147

204

43

38.63

210

45.7

38.73

229

52.7

39,

0.168

210

43.2

38.64

216

45.9

38.74

236

53

39.1

0.189

218

43.5

38.65

225

46.2

38.75

226

53.2

39.2

 

Table 2

Experimental results obtained on the effect of hydraulic resistance on cleaning efficiency and energy consumption. ygas=28.8 m/s const.

Vgas m/s

Qliq m3/hour

Plate Ø4, φ = 15°

Plate Ø3, φ = 15°

Plate Ø2, φ = 15°

ΔPcb,

Pa

KSP,

W

η, %

ΔPcb,

Pa

KSP,

W

η, %

ΔPcb,

Pa

KSP,

W

η, %

28.8

0.071

4128

989.9

99.71

4272

1045

99.76

4728

1210

99.8

0.08

4320

990.1

99.72

4464

1046

99.77

4927

1210.2

99.89

0.13

4551

990.4

99.73

4695

1047

99.78

5150

1210.4

99.92

0.147

4743

990.6

99.74

4887

1049

99.79

5334

1210.6

99.96

0.168

4897

990.8

99.75

5041

1050

99.8

5496

1210.8

99.97

0.189

5089

991

99.76

5233

1054

99.81

5643

1211

99.99

 

 

Plate Ø4, φ = 30°

Plate Ø3, φ = 30°

Plate Ø2, φ = 30°

28.8

0.071

3013

722.7

98.3

3118

762.8

99.66

3451

883.2

99.75

0.08

3153

722.8

98.31

3259

762.9

99.67

3596

883.3

99.76

0.13

3322

723.1

98.32

3427

763.2

99.68

3759

883.6

99.77

0.147

3462

723.2

98.33

3567

763.3

99.69

3894

883.8

99.78

0.168

3574

723.4

98.34

3679

763.5

99.7

4011

883.9

99.79

0.189

3714

723.5

98.35

3819

763.7

99.71

3838

884

99.81

 

 

Plate Ø4, φ = 45°

Plate Ø3, φ = 45°

Plate Ø2, φ = 45°

28.8

0.071

2690

644.4

98.24

2784

680.4

98.28

3081

788.5

99.35

0.08

2816

644.5

98.26

2909

680.5

98.29

3211

788.6

99.36

0.13

2966

644.8

98.27

3060

680.8

98.3

3356

788.8

99.37

0.147

3091

644.9

98.28

3185

680.9

98.5

3476

789

99.38

0.168

3191

645

98.29

3285

681.1

98.52

3581

789.1

99.39

0.189

3316

645

98.3

3410

681.2

98.54

3426

789.2

99.41

 

In order to evaluate the influence of the variable factors on the cleaning efficiency and energy consumption in the apparatus, it was determined using the method of mathematical planning of multifactorial experiments [11,12,13,15].

In theoretical studies and multi-factor experiments, it was found that the diameter of the squeegee plate hole (X1), dust gas velocity (X2), angle of installation of the squeegee plate on the device (X3) and liquid consumption (X4) are the factors that most affect the cleaning efficiency and energy consumption of the device. Based on the above-mentioned practical and theoretical studies and the results of multi-factor experiments, the change ranges of these factors were determined. Table 3 shows the levels and intervals of change of the factors.

Table 3.

Factor levels and change intervals

No

Factors

Unit of measure

Identification of factors

Interval of change

Levels of factors

lower (–1)

main (0)

high (+1)

1.

Spherical plate hole diameter

mm

X1

1

2

3

4

2.

Dust gas velocity

m/s

X2

10.7

7.4

18.1

28.8

3.

The angle of mounting the spherical plate to the device

degree

X3

15

15 o

30 o

45 o

4.

Fluid consumption

m3/ hour

X4

0.059

0.071

0.13

0.189

 

The hydraulic resistance of the device (Y1), the energy spent on dust cleaning (Y2) and the cleaning efficiency of the device (Y3) were taken as the evaluation criteria when conducting multi-factor experiments. Assuming that the influence of factors on the evaluation criteria is fully described by a second-order polynomial, experiments (V4) was implemented based on the plan [2].

In order to reduce the influence of uncontrollable factors on the evaluation criteria, the sequence of conducting experiments was determined using a random number table, and separate experiments were conducted to determine the optimal parameters for cleaning scoperphosphate dust. The results of the experiment are presented in Table 4.

Table 4.

Experimental results obtained using a table of random numbers

X1

X2

X3

X4

Y1

Y2

Y3

-1

-1

-1

1

312

79.6

89.77

1

-1

-1

1

3316

645.3

99.87

-1

1

-1

-1

4728

1209.8

99.98

1

1

-1

-1

4128

989.5

99.91

-1

-1

1

-1

203

52.2

68.5

1

-1

1

-1

177

42.4

66,86

-1

1

1

1

3426

789.3

99.95

1

1

1

1

3316

645.3

99.79

-1

0

0

0

1501

351.3

91.8

1

0

0

0

1326

291.5

97.59

0

-1

0

0

226

51

69.48

0

1

0

0

3427

763.2

99.78

0

0

-1

0

1875

419.6

98.18

0

0

1

0

1222

273.5

96.65

0

0

0

-1

1259

309.3

97.57

0

0

0

1

1542

310.3

98.93

0

0

0

0

1367

306.3

98.41

 

The following regression equations that adequately represent the evaluation criteria are HARTLI, treating the results of the experiment accordingly– Received under 4 programs:

The hydraulic resistance of the rotary plate scrubber is determined by the following regression equation, Pa;

2470,775+209,5003 X1+1601,823X2-326,934X3+141,8045X4+ +161,0046X1X1+574,1728X2X2+295,7188X3X3+ +147,6249X4X4-461,386X1X2-317,93X1X3+440,4072X1X4+0,087585X2X3-343,963X2X4- 151.66X3X4

The energy consumption for the superphosphate dust cleaning process is determined according to the following regression equation, kJ/1000m3

525.1424+13.20617X1+356.413X2-73.1211X3+0.467121X4+ +43.71852X1X1+129.4685 X2X2+68.82625 X3X3+32.07387 X4X4-115.137 X1X2-62.4607 X1X4+81 X1X45 -17.2835 X2X3-101.424 X2X4-4.25413 X3X4

Superphosphate dust removal efficiency is determined by the following regression equation, %

99.66916+1.401656 X1+15.14628 X2-0.76481X3+0.679833X4-0.31127X1X1-10.3738 X2X22.408061X3X3+3.242856X4X4-1.47839X1X3+1.455893X1X3+1.455893X2X084+ ,03727X2X4-5,81982X3X4

Using the regression equation obtained for the superphosphate dust cleaning process and energy consumption, graphs of dependence of cleaning efficiency and energy consumption on the variable factors in the apparatus were constructed. The results are presented in Figures 2, 3 and 4.

 

Figure 2. Dependence of hydraulic resistance on variable factors

a–dependence of hydraulic resistance on the diameter of the plate hole; b – dependence of hydraulic resistance on gas speed; v - dependence of hydraulic resistance on the angle of installation of the spherical plate on the apparatus; g – dependence of hydraulic resistance on liquid consumption

 

Figure 3. Dependence of energy consumption on variable factor

a–dependence of energy consumption on the diameter of the plate hole; b – dependence of energy consumption on gas speed; v - dependence of energy consumption on the angle of installation of the spherical plate on the apparatus; g – dependence of energy consumption on liquid consumption

 

Figure 4. Dependence of cleaning efficiency on variable factor

a–the dependence of cleaning efficiency on the diameter of the plate hole; b – dependence of cleaning efficiency on gas speed; v - dependence of the cleaning efficiency on the angle of installation of the spherical plate on the apparatus; g – dependence of cleaning efficiency on liquid consumption

 

As can be seen from the analysis of the obtained regression equations and graphs, all factors have a significant impact on the evaluation criteria. In addition, fluid consumption, dust air velocity, diameter of the plate hole and the angle of installation of the plate on the apparatus are in a complex relationship with the studied factors.

In order to determine the optimal values of factors affecting the researched processes, i.e. hydraulic resistance of the apparatus, cleaning efficiency and energy consumption, regression equations (1), (2) and (3) were solved separately for the superphosphate dust cleaning process. In this case, the condition that the superphosphate dust cleaning efficiency is higher than 98.78% was accepted according to the requirements of GOST-62-198-142 [2]. This task was solved using the Excel program "search for a solution" (poisk reshenia) function on the PK "Pentium IV" computer, and the coded variable factors acceptable values in the form were obtained and changed from coded values to natural values Table 5.

Table 5.

Converting from coded values to natural values

No

Factors

Unit of measure

Conditional designation

Encoded value

Real

value

Superphosphate dust

Superphosphate dust

1.

Spherical plate hole diameter

mm

X1

 

3.75

2.

Dust gas velocity

m/s

X2

 

22.6

3.

The angle of mounting the spherical plate to the device

degree

X3

 

20

4.

Fluid consumption

m3/hour

X4

 

0.163

 

Thus, the optimal parameters of the apparatus for the dust removal process selected for the sample were brought to the standard state and can be written as follows.

For the superphosphate dust removal process;

  • The diameter of the hole of the spherical plate, df=3.75 mm
  • Dust gas velocity, y=22.6 m/s
  • The angle of mounting the spherical plate to the device, b=20 degrees
  • liquid consumption, Qc=0.163 m3/hour for one nozzle. If we take into account that the number of nozzles in the device is 4, then the liquid consumption is Qc=0.652 m3/ hour

At these values of the factors, the energy consumption of the device was 4.2 kW/h, the cleaning efficiency was 99.6691%, and its hydraulic resistance was 2.47 kPa.

Conclusion

According to the experimental results, the cleaning efficiency is 6.03% higher than the existing wet cleaning devices, 1m3 it was found that the liquid used for air cleaning is 2 times less and the energy consumption is 0.8 times less, which fully satisfies the technical requirements for this type of equipment.

 

References:

  1. Архипов В.А., Березиков А.П. Основы теории инженерно-физического эксперимента. Томск: Изд-во Томского политехнического университета. – 2008. – 206 с.
  2. Кольцов В. Б., Кольцова О. В. Процессы и аппараты защиты окружающей среды. – 2016. – 239стр.
  3. Исомидинов А.С. Разработка эффективных методов и устройств очистки пылевых газов химической промышленности: Дисс. … PhD. – Ташкент, 2020. – 118 с.
  4. Исомидинов А. С. Исследование гидравлического сопротивления роторно-фильтрующего аппарата //Universum: технические науки. – 2019. – №. 10-1 (67). – С. 54-58.
  5. Мадаминова Г. И., Тожиев Р. Ж., Каримов И. Т. Барабанное устройство для мокрой очистки запыленного газа и воздуха //Universum: технические науки. – 2021. – №. 5-4 (86). – С. 45-49.
  6. Исомидинов А.С., Тожиев Р.Ж., Каримов И.Т. Чангли ҳавони тозаловчи ротор-фильтрли аппарат фильтрловчи тўрли материалининг актив ва пассив юзаларини аниқлаш. I Международной научно-практической конференции “Актуальные проблемы внедрения инновационной техники и технологий на предприятиях по производству строительных материалов, химической промышленности и в смежных отраслях”. 2019/5/25. Т-3. №5. 429-431б.
  7. Вальдберг А.Ю., Николайкина Н.Е. Процессы и аппараты защиты окружающей среды. – М.: Дрофа, 2008. –239 с.
  8. Rasuljon T. et al. Research of the hydraulic resistance of the inertial scrubber //Universum: технические науки. – 2021. – №. 7-3 (88). – С. 44-51.
  9. Исомиддинов А. С., Давронбеков А. А. Исследование гидродинамических режимов сферической углубленной трубы //Universum: технические науки. – 2021. – №. 7-1 (88). – С. 53-58.
  10. Isomidinov A. S., Madaliev A. N. Hydrodynamics and aerodynamics of rotor filter cleaner for cleaning dusty gases //LI international correspondence scientific and practical conference" international scientific review of the problems and prospects of modern science and education". – 2018. – С. 29-32.
  11. Кобзарь А.И. Прикладная математическая статистика. Для инженеров и научных работников.–Москва: Физматлит, – 2006. – 816 с.
  12. Выгодский М.Я. Справочник по высшей математике. – Москва: Наука, – 1972. – 872 с.
  13. Isomidinov A. Mathematical modeling of the optimal parameters of rotory filter apparatus for wet cleaning of dusty gases //International journal of advanced research in science, Engineering and technology. – 2019. – Т. 6. – №. 10. – С. 258-264.
  14. Isomiddinov A. et al. Application of rotor-filter dusty gas cleaner in industry and identifying its efficiency //Austrian Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences. – 2019. – №. 9-10.
  15. Tojiev R. J., Sulaymonov A. M. Comparative analysis of devices for wet cleaning of industrial gases //Scientific progress. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 8. – С. 100-108.
Информация об авторах

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Fergana Polytechnic Institute, Republic of Uzbekistan, Fergana

д-р техн. наук, проф., Ферганский политехнический институт, Республика Узбекистан, г. Фергана

Doctoral student, Fergana Polytechnic Institute, Republic of Uzbekistan, Fergana

докторант (PhD), Ферганский политехнический институт, Республика Узбекистан, г. Фергана

Master's degree student, Fergana Polytechnic Institute, Republic of Uzbekistan, Fergana

магистрант, Ферганский политехнический институт, Республика Узбекистан, г. Фергана

Журнал зарегистрирован Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор), регистрационный номер ЭЛ №ФС77-54434 от 17.06.2013
Учредитель журнала - ООО «МЦНО»
Главный редактор - Ахметов Сайранбек Махсутович.
Top