IMPLEMENTATION OF DIFFERENTIATED LEARNING TECHNOLOGY IN HISTORY LESSONS IN A SMALL SCHOOL

ABSTRACT

In a small school, the implementation of differentiated learning technology in history lessons is a complex but extremely important task. This article explores the features and methods of introducing a differentiated approach to the educational process, taking into account the specifics of small schools, where resources are limited and the needs of students are diverse.

АННОТАЦИЯ

В условиях малокомплектной школы реализация технологии дифференцированного обучения на уроках истории представляет собой сложную, но крайне важную задачу. Данная статья исследует особенности и методы внедрения дифференцированного подхода в образовательный процесс, учитывая специфику малокомплектных школ, где ресурсы ограничены, а потребности учащихся разнообразны.

Keywords: differentiated instruction, small school, history lessons, individualization, educational methods, project-based learning, effectiveness assessment.

Ключевые слова: дифференцированное обучение, малокомплектная школа, уроки истории, индивидуализация, образовательные методы, проектная деятельность, оценка эффективности.

1. Introduction

In the modern world, education is regarded as a key factor in the development of individuals and society. The issue of the effectiveness of educational systems is particularly acute in the context of small schools, which, despite their limitations, play an important role in ensuring accessibility and quality of education in remote and rural areas. Small schools often face the problems of lack of resources, small number of students and diversity of their educational needs. In this context, differentiated instruction emerges as a strategy that can significantly improve the educational process, taking into account the individual characteristics of each student.

Differentiated instruction, based on the principles of individualization and adaptation of the educational process, is an approach that allows teachers to use the limited resources of the school more effectively, while ensuring that the educational needs of each student are met to the maximum extent possible. In particular, in history classes, where it is important not only to master factual material, but also to develop critical thinking and analytical skills, differentiated instruction can be a tool that promotes a deeper and more versatile understanding of the subject.

In this article we will consider the theoretical foundations of differentiated teaching, the peculiarities of its implementation in the conditions of small schools, as well as methodological approaches to the implementation of this technology in history classes. In addition, we will present examples of practical implementation of differentiated teaching and discuss possible methods of assessing its effectiveness. The aim of the article is to substantiate the necessity and possibility of implementing differentiated instruction in small schools to improve the quality of education and promote the comprehensive development of students.

2. Theoretical bases of differentiated learning

Differentiated learning is a comprehensive approach aimed at adapting the educational process to the individual characteristics and needs of students [1]. This method is based on the belief that each student has a unique set of abilities, interests and levels of preparation, and that the success of learning depends on the degree of compliance of teaching materials and methods with these individual characteristics [2].

The theoretical underpinnings of differentiated instruction include several key models and strategies:

1. Content differentiation involves offering students a variety of learning materials and tasks that are appropriate to their level of knowledge and ability [3]. This may include the use of different leveled texts, tasks, and projects, allowing students to work at their optimal level of difficulty.

2. Differentiation of the learning process consists in adapting the methods and forms of work in the lesson to the individual characteristics of students [4]. This can manifest itself in the use of various teaching strategies such as group work, individual consultations, interactive exercises, etc.

3. Differentiation of results is oriented to a variety of forms and criteria of knowledge assessment [5]. Instead of uniform tests and exams, differentiation of results implies the use of a variety of assessment methods, such as projects, presentations, practical work, which allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills in the most appropriate way.

Within these models, differentiated instruction strives to create a flexible educational environment in which each student can feel comfortable and be an active participant in the learning process [6]. This approach not only improves academic performance, but also develops students' skills of independence, critical thinking, and self-assessment, which is an important component of their future success [7].

3. Features of implementation of differentiated teaching in small schools

The implementation of differentiated instruction in small schools has its own specific aspects that need to be taken into account in order to achieve maximum effectiveness [8]. These features are due to both limited resources and the unique advantages offered by small class sizes and close teacher-student relationships [9].

1. Small classes are one of the key features of small-size schools. It allows teachers to know each student, his/her strengths and weaknesses, interests and needs in more detail [10]. Such personalization of the educational process contributes to more accurate adaptation of teaching materials and methods to individual characteristics of students.

2. Limited resources require teachers and school administrators to be creative in using available materials and technologies [11]. In conditions of limited budget and lack of teaching aids, it is important to use all available resources, including open educational resources on the Internet, sharing experiences and materials with other schools, and involving the local community and parents as additional resources [12].

3. An integrated approach to learning that takes into account not only academic, but also social and psychological aspects of students' development is an important element of differentiated education in small schools [13]. In the conditions of close communication and interaction, teachers can not only impart knowledge, but also provide support in personal and social development of students, which contributes to the formation of a harmoniously developed personality [14].

The implementation of differentiated instruction in small schools requires from teachers not only a deep understanding of the theoretical foundations of this approach, but also the ability to adapt it to the specific conditions and resources available in the school [15]. This makes it possible to maximize the potential of differentiated instruction to improve the quality of education and promote the all-round development of students.

4. Methodological approaches to differentiated learning in history lessons

In history lessons, differentiated learning can be implemented through various methodological approaches that allow students to understand historical events more deeply, develop critical thinking and analytical skills [16]. It is important that these approaches are adapted to the specifics of small schools and take into account the individual characteristics of each student [17].

1. The use of multilevel tasks is one of the main methods of differentiated teaching [18]. Teachers can offer tasks of different complexity, allowing students to choose those that correspond to their level of preparation and interests. For example, for the same topic, there can be prepared tasks at the level of familiarization with facts, analysis of historical events and creative application of knowledge in new contexts.

2. The project method allows students to choose research topics according to their interests and capabilities [19]. This method promotes the development of independence, research skills and the ability to work with various sources of information. In small schools, projects can be organized both individually and in small groups, which allows pupils to interact and share experiences.

3. Interactive forms of learning, such as role-playing games, debates, historical simulations, activate the learning process and take into account different abilities of students [20]. These forms of learning allow students not only to assimilate information, but also to apply it in practical situations, develop communication skills and the ability to argue their point of view.

4. The use of digital technologies opens new opportunities for differentiated learning [21]. In the conditions of small schools, where access to modern technologies may be limited, it is important to use available digital tools such as computers, tablets, educational applications and platforms that allow students to work with a variety of information sources and individualize the learning process.

Methodological approaches to differentiated teaching in history lessons should be flexible and diverse, allowing students to actively participate in the educational process and achieve their potential [22]. This requires from teachers not only a deep knowledge of the subject, but also the ability to effectively use various methods and technologies to meet the individual needs of students.

5. Examples of practical implementation

Practical implementation of differentiated instruction in history classes requires teachers not only to have a theoretical understanding of this approach, but also to be able to apply it in specific teaching situations [23]. In small schools, where teachers often work with small groups of students, the opportunities for individualization of learning are significantly expanded [24]. Here are some examples of how differentiated teaching can be applied in practice:

1. Developing Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) for each student. Within the framework of the IEP, teachers can define learning objectives, content, methods and forms of work, as well as assessment criteria for each student [25]. This allows students to work at their own level of difficulty and at their own pace, which contributes to deeper learning of the material.

2. Using digital technologies to access a variety of information sources. In small schools, where access to books and other materials may be limited, digital resources become an indispensable tool [26]. Students can use the Internet to search for information, work with e-books, watch video lectures, and participate in virtual learning courses.

3. Conducting lessons using critical thinking methods. Teachers can organize lessons where students do not just memorize facts, but also analyze them, identify cause-and-effect relationships, evaluate different points of view and draw their own conclusions [27]. For example, it is possible to organize lessons-discussions where pupils discuss historical events, assess their impact on modern society and formulate their opinions.

4. Organizing project activities. Pupils can work on projects related to the study of history, where they independently choose a topic, conduct research, prepare presentations and defend their projects [28]. This approach develops research skills, the ability to work with information and present the results of their work.

5. Use of multilevel assignments. Teachers can offer tasks of different levels of difficulty, allowing students to choose those that match their level of preparation and interests [29]. For example, for the same topic, there can be prepared tasks at the level of familiarization with facts, analysis of historical events and creative application of knowledge in new contexts.

Practical implementation of differentiated learning in history classes requires teachers to be creative, to be able to adapt teaching material and teaching methods to the individual needs of students [30]. This allows to create a more effective and interesting educational environment that contributes to the comprehensive development of students.

6. Assessing the effectiveness of differentiated learning

Differentiated instruction aims to make sure that effectiveness is at the top of the list because it helps us see if we can meet students' learning needs and help them grow [31]. In small schools where resources are scarce, assessment of learning is more central - it is now even more important in making decisions about what needs to be done.

An effective way to assess the success of differentiated instruction is to test student achievement [33]. Teachers can track individual students' progress, analyze achievement data before and after adopting a different approach (at different levels of difficulty), and examine students' performance on multi-level tasks or projects.

Psychological and social development can be seen as indicators of the impact of differentiated instruction on communication skills, group work, independence and self-confidence [34]. Teachers can observe changes in students' behavior, their relationships with peers, as well as their participation in school life and extracurricular activities.

Feedback from students and their parents is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of different learning strategies [35]. Students can discuss how comfortable they are in the learning process and how interested they are in the subject matter, and parents can assess changes in their children's behavior and progress. Comparing results with controls is useful for determining the effectiveness of specialized instruction in small schools. If possible, you may want to evaluate the performance and development of students who are taught in the traditional method compared to those who attend a differentiated program.

The use of a criterion-based approach to assessment allows to determine more accurately the degree of mastery of necessary knowledge and skills by students [37].

Assessing the effectiveness of differentiated instruction is complex because it requires a comprehensive approach that takes into account both academic achievement and the social and personal development of students [38]. This makes it easier for teachers and administrators to make informed decisions and apply the most effective approach.

7. Conclusion

The introduction of personalized learning technology in history lessons in small schools can be seen as a very challenging but noble endeavor. This approach facilitates the adaptation of education to the unique characteristics of each student, thus guaranteeing not only an increase in the level of knowledge acquisition, but also the development of core competencies. Given the limited number of students, teachers in small schools are given the opportunity to get to know students on a personal level, including any special requirements they may have - an aspect that is of particular importance within the framework of differentiated pedagogy.

Thus, methodological tools such as multiple levels of assignments with a project method interwoven through interactive forms plus digital technologies are applied to underpin the theoretical foundations of differentiated instruction, where different models and differentiations (e.g. content, process and outcomes) provide flexibility corresponding to adaptability. The aim of these approaches is to engage students directly in the educational process and help them to reach their potential.

Effective implementation of differentiated education in practice requires teachers' creativity in adapting content and teaching methods to individual student needs. The effectiveness of this approach can be assessed by observing student performance; feedback from parents and peers can help support this assessment. In addition, benchmarking helps us understand the impact of personalized learning on student growth. Differentiated instruction inherently offers learning and developmental benefits that enrich learning. It promotes a multifaceted understanding of content, which is important for students' holistic development. In small schools with limited resources, this may seem like an appropriate approach to providing a quality education that can be envisioned as a promising future for students.

References:

1. Tomlinson, C.A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. 2nd Edition. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
2. Vygotsky, L.S. (1991). Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Educational Psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika.
3. Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom: How to Reach and Teach All Learners. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.
4. Selevko, G.K. (1998). Sovremennye obrazovatel'nye tekhnologii [Modern Educational Technologies]. Moscow: Narodnoe obrazovanie.
5. Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
6. Yakimanskaya, I.S. (1996). Lichnostno-orientirovannoe obuchenie v sovremennoy shkole [Person-Oriented Learning in Modern School]. Moscow: Sentyabr'.
7. Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2012). Teacher educators' perceptions and use of differentiated instruction practices: An exploratory investigation. Action in Teacher Education, 34(4), 309-327.
8. Bayborodova, L.V. (2007). Obuchenie v raznovozrastnykh gruppakh uchashchikhsya sel'skoy malochislennoy shkoly [Teaching in Multi-Age Groups of Students in Rural Small Schools]. Yaroslavl: YSPU Publishing House.
9. Smit, R., & Humpert, W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in small schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1152-1162.
10. Shcherbakova, E.V. (2012). Sel'skaya malokomplektnaya shkola: sovremennoe sostoyanie, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Rural Small School: Current State, Problems and Development Prospects]. In Theory and Practice of Education in the Modern World (pp. 107-109).
11. Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), 935-947.
12. Guryanova, M.P. (2000). Sel'skaya shkola i sotsial'naya pedagogika [Rural School and Social Pedagogy]. Minsk: Amalfeya.
13. Valiandes, S. (2015). Evaluating the impact of differentiated instruction on literacy and reading in mixed ability classrooms: Quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 17-26.
14. Podlasy, I.P. (2004). Pedagogika: 100 voprosov - 100 otvetov: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov [Pedagogy: 100 Questions - 100 Answers: Textbook for Universities]. Moscow: VLADOS-press.
15. Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291-301.
16. Studenikin, M.T. (2000). Metodika prepodavaniya istorii v shkole [Methods of Teaching History in School]. Moscow: Vlados.
17. Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111-127.
18. Korotkova, M.V., & Studenikin, M.T. (1999). Metodika obucheniya istorii v skhemakh, tablitsakh, opisaniyakh [Methods of Teaching History in Schemes, Tables, Descriptions]. Moscow: Vlados
19. Watts-Taffe, S., Laster, B. P., Broach, L., Marinak, B., McDonald Connor, C., & Walker-Dalhouse, D. (2012). Differentiated instruction: Making informed teacher decisions. The Reading Teacher, 66(4), 303-314.
20. Polat, E.S. (2008). Novye pedagogicheskie i informatsionnye tekhnologii v sisteme obrazovaniya [New Pedagogical and Information Technologies in the Education System]. Moscow: Akademiya.
21. Pham, H. L. (2012). Differentiated instruction and the need to integrate teaching and practice. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(1), 13-20.
22. Shogan, V.V. (2007). Metodika prepodavaniya istorii v shkole: novaya tekhnologiya lichnostno-orientirovannogo istoricheskogo obrazovaniya [Methods of Teaching History in School: New Technology of Personality-Oriented Historical Education]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks.
23. Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
24. Bayborodova, L.V., & Chernyavskaya, A.P. (2002). Metodika obucheniya istorii v sel'skoy shkole [Methods of Teaching History in Rural Schools]. Moscow: VLADOS.
25. Prast, E. J., Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. (2018). Differentiated instruction in primary mathematics: Effects of teacher professional development on student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 22-34.
26. Selevko, G.K. (2005). Pedagogicheskie tekhnologii na osnove informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh sredstv [Pedagogical Technologies Based on Information and Communication Tools]. Moscow: NII shkol'nykh tekhnologiy.
27. Zagashev, I.O., & Zair-Bek, S.I. (2003). Kriticheskoe myshlenie: tekhnologiya razvitiya [Critical Thinking: Technology of Development]. St. Petersburg: Al'yans-Del'ta.
28. Pakhomova, N.Yu. (2005). Metod uchebnogo proekta v obrazovatel'nom uchrezhdenii [Method of Educational Project in Educational Institution]. Moscow: ARKTI.
29. Unt, I.E. (1990). Individualizatsiya i differentsiatsiya obucheniya [Individualization and Differentiation of Learning]. Moscow: Pedagogika.
30. Osmolovskaya, I.M. (2004). Differentsiatsiya protsessa obucheniya v sovremennoy shkole [Differentiation of the Learning Process in Modern School]. Moscow: Moscow Psychological and Social Institute Publishing House; Voronezh: NPO "MODEK" Publishing House.
31. Goddard, Y. L., Neumerski, C. M., Goddard, R. D., Salloum, S. J., & Berebitsky, D. (2010). A multilevel exploratory study of the relationship between teachers' perceptions of principals' instructional support and group norms for instruction in elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 336-357.
32. Zvonnikov, V.I., & Chelyshkova, M.B. (2013). Sovremennye sredstva otsenivaniya rezul'tatov obucheniya [Modern Means of Assessing Learning Outcomes]. Moscow: Akademiya.
33. Amonashvili, Sh.A. (1984). Vospitatel'naya i obrazovatel'naya funktsiya otsenki ucheniya shkol'nikov [Educational Function of Assessing Students' Learning]. Moscow: Pedagogika.
34. Asmolov, A.G. (2008). Kak proektirovat' universal'nye uchebnye deystviya v nachal'noy shkole: ot deystviya k mysli [How to Design Universal Learning Activities in Elementary School: From Action to Thought]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
35. Levy, H. M. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(4), 161-164.
36. Zagvyazinsky, V.I. (2001). Teoriya obucheniya: Sovremennaya interpretatsiya [Learning Theory: Modern Interpretation]. Moscow: Akademiya.
37. Avanesov, V.S. (1989). Osnovy nauchnoy organizatsii pedagogicheskogo kontrolya v vysshey shkole [Fundamentals of Scientific Organization of Pedagogical Control in Higher Education]. Moscow: MISiS.
38. Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. A. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52(2), 31-47.