ONLINE MOLECULAR DOCKING AND ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF CYANURIC ACID DERIVATIVES

ОНЛАЙН МОЛЕКУЛЯРНЫЙ ДОКИНГ И АНАЛИЗ БИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ АКТИВНОСТИ ПРОИЗВОДНЫХ ЦИАНУРОВОЙ КИСЛОТЫ
Цитировать:
ONLINE MOLECULAR DOCKING AND ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF CYANURIC ACID DERIVATIVES // Universum: химия и биология : электрон. научн. журн. Ganiev B.S. [и др.]. 2022. 6(96). URL: https://7universum.com/ru/nature/archive/item/13834 (дата обращения: 21.11.2024).
Прочитать статью:
DOI - 10.32743/UniChem.2022.96.6.13834

 

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the results of molecular docking of urea-substituted cyanuric acid products using the online predictive CB-Dock and PASS programs, as well as information about possible areas of their application by biological activity.

 

АННОТАЦИЯ

В данной работе приведены результаты молекулярного докинга мочевино замещенных продуктов циануровой кислоты с применением онлайн прогнозирующей  программы CB-Dock и PASS, а так же сведения об возьможных областей  их примения по биологической активности.

 

Keywords: CB-Dock, PASS, biological activities, cyanuric acid, protein-ligand docking.

Ключевые слова: CB-Dock, PASS, биологические активности, циануровая кислота, стыковка белок-лиганд.

 

I. Introduction

Previously, we published a synthesis technique, quantum chemical calculations and IR spectroscopy of a urea-substituted cyanuric acid product [1-3]. In this paper, we discuss the prediction results of CB-Dock and PASS online programs, the biological activity of these compounds.

CB-Dock was designed to perform blind docking at predicted locations, rather than on the entire surface of the protein. Therefore, the first step is to detect the intended binding sites (i.e., cavity detection). Since ligand binding sites are usually larger cavities, we select several upper cavities according to the size of the cavity for further analysis (i.e., cavity sorting). Then we calculate the docking center and adjust the size of the docking box. These parameters are necessary for joining molecules using AutoDock Vina (Center and Size). After the docking process is completed, the associated poses are ranked according to the docking score (Dock and Rerank). The first conformation is considered the best binding position, and the corresponding site is the optimal binding site for the requested ligand. Figure 1 shows the CB-Dock workflow.

 

Fig.1. The CB-Dock workflow performing molecular ligand docking

 

Protein-ligand coupling is widely used to predict ligand binding and affinity. Protein-ligand docking is a powerful tool for computer-assisted drug discovery (or CADD). Currently, there are dozens of commercial and academic tools for protein-ligand docking [3-7]. Most docking tools require a ligand binding region (rotation and translation of the ligand in this region) in advance to find the most favorable binding mode in terms of energy. The binding region is usually represented as a cubic block, so its size and center are crucial for accurate docking, since they define the boundaries of the conformational sampling space. In many application articles, the binding areas are unknown. In order to identify potential interactions between a given protein and a ligand, it is necessary to perform docking on the entire surface of the protein in order to find the most likely binding method. This process is called blind docking [4, 7]. Compared to conventional docking, blind docking is less reliable and stable because the docking space is usually too large for sufficient sampling using a limited number of random searches. Nevertheless, blind docking is especially valuable for detecting unexpected interactions that may occur in unidentified binding modes [7].

II. THE EXPERIMENTAL PART

Synthesis of mono-urea substituted cyanuric acid product.

0.001 mol (0.129 g) of cyanuric acid was added to a suspension of 0.001 mol (0.129 g) of urea in 50 ml of water. The reaction mixture was boiled for one hour. The reaction mixture was left for 2 days at room temperature. After 2 days, the fallen crystals were filtered out, washed with a small amount of methanol, acetone and hexane. After recrystallization, 0.15876 g (84%) of 1-(4,6-dioxo-1,3,5-triazinane-2-ylidene) urea (L1) with T. plav was obtained from methanol. 252oC.

Similarly, di-, tri-urea substituted cyanuric acid products were synthesized.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In order to identify potential interactions between a given protein and a ligand, it is necessary to perform docking on the entire surface of the protein in order to find the most likely binding method. This process is called blind docking [4,8.10]. Compared to conventional docking, blind docking is less reliable and stable because the docking space is usually too large for sufficient sampling using a limited number of random searches. Nevertheless, blind docking is especially valuable for detecting unexpected interactions that may occur in unidentified binding modes [9,11].

During the docking processing, a progress bar appeared showing the task status. When the processing was completed (after about 3 minutes), the web page was updated with the results. Table 1 lists the Vina scores, the cavity dimensions, the docking centers and the intended cavity dimensions.

Table 1.

Results after docking completion

CyM1 -- 3ij2

Vina
score

Cavity
size

Center

Size

x

y

z

x

y

z

-12.4

2493

-10

62

1

25

31

17

-11.1

2380

4

68

28

26

28

17

-11.1

1081

-19

85

9

23

17

17

-10.8

1105

-6

67

14

28

23

17

-9.8

1206

8

47

13

17

17

25

 

CyM2 -- 3ij2

Vina
score

Cavity
size

Center

Size

x

y

z

x

y

z

-10

2493

-10

62

1

25

31

18

-9.7

2380

4

68

28

26

28

18

-9.4

1081

-19

85

9

18

18

18

-8.9

1105

-6

67

14

28

18

18

-7.9

1206

8

47

13

18

18

25

 

 

After selecting the ligand in the table, the structure is visualized in interactive 3D graphics (Fig. 2).

 

CyM1 -- 3ij2

CyM2 -- 3ij2

CyM3 -- 3ij2

Figure 2. Structures after molecular docking of urea substituted cyanuric acid products

 

In our example, the upper binding method with a Vina score for the CyM1 ligand is -12.4, but all ligands have an equal binding cavity (i.e., 2493). And for CyM2 ligands, Vina scores are -10 and CyM3 Vina scores are -8.5 respectively.

Table 2.

The value of cavity sizes and Vina scores for CyM1- CyM3 ligands

CyM1

CyM2

CyM3

 

Vina
score

Cavity
size

Vina
score

Cavity
size

Vina
score

Cavity
size

 
 

-12.4

2493

-10

2493

-8.5

2493

 

-11.1

2380

-9.7

2380

-7.9

1105

 

-11.1

1081

-9.4

1081

-7.8

2380

 

-10.8

1105

-8.9

1105

-7.7

1206

 

-9.8

1206

-7.9

1206

-7.6

1081

 

 

Biological activity

Activity/

Inactivity

Urea Substituted Cyanuric acid products

CyM1

CyM2

CyM3

1

Leukopoiesis stimulator [12]

Pa

0,683

0,683

0,660

Pi

0,008

0,008

0,010

2

NADPH peroxidase inhibitor [13]

Pa

0,696

0,696

0,793

Pi

0,028

0,028

0,013

3

Pterine deaminase inhibitor [14]

Pa

0,858

0,858

0,843

Pi

0,003

0,003

0,003

4

Dimethylarginine inhibitor

Pa

0,749

0,749

0,825

Pi

0,010

0,010

0,005

5

Treatment of phobic disorders

Pa

0,714

0,714

0,806

Pi

0,070

0,070

0,032

 

IV. Conclusion

We have previously studied the obtained new compounds by quantum chemical and physico-chemical methods [1-3], in this article their biological properties are studied. Using the PASS online program, conclusions were drawn about the additional biomedical potential of compounds by comparing the results of bioactivity predictions with data determined experimentally in scientific publications [12-14].

 

References:

  1. B.Sh. Ganiev, F.S. Aslonova, U.M. Mardonov, J.M. Ashurov. Synthesis and IR-spectroscopy of cyanuric acid urea and thiourea exchange products. 1st Uzbekistan-Japan International Symposium on Green Chemistry and Sustainable Development, Tashkent. November 29-30, 2021. P. 51
  2. Б.Ш. Ганиев, У.М. Мардонов, Ж.М. Ашуров, Г.К. Холикова, Ф.И. Музафаров. Изучение координационных свойств мочевины замещенных продуктов циануровой кислоты. Материалы Республиканской научно-практической конференции «Актуальные проблемы химии комплексных соединений», посвященной 90-летию Парпиева Нусрата Агзамовича. Ташкент. - НУУ. - 2021 г. 14-15 сентября. - С. 37-38
  3. Б.Ш. Ганиев, У.М. Мардонов, Ж.М. Ашуров, Г.К. Холикова, Ф.И. Музафаров. Гранулярные молекулярные орбитали и дескрипторы глобальной реакционной способности триазиновых соединений. Материалы Республиканской научно-практической конференции «Актуальные проблемы химии комплексных соединений», посвященной 90-летию Парпиева Нусрата Агзамовича. Ташкент. - НУУ. - 2021 г. 14-15 сентября. - С. 35-36
  4. http://clab.labshare.cn/cb-dock/php/index.php
  5. https://www.rcsb.org/
  6. Feng, D., Kim, T., Özkan, E., Light, M., Torkin, R., Teng, K. K., ... & Garcia, K. C. (2010). Molecular and structural insight into proNGF engagement of p75NTR and sortilin. Journal of molecular biology396(4), 967-984.
  7. Liu, Y., Grimm, M., Dai, W. T., Hou, M. C., Xiao, Z. X., & Cao, Y. (2020). CB-Dock: a web server for cavity detection-guided protein–ligand blind docking. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica41(1), 138-144.
  8. Iorga B, Herlem D, Barré E, Guillou C. Acetylcholine nicotinic receptors: finding the putative binding site of allosteric modulators using the “blind docking” approach. J Mol Model. 2006;12:366–72
  9. Yuriev E, Holien J, Ramsland PA. Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012–2013 in review. J Mol Recognit. 2015;28:581–604.
  10. Meiler J, Baker D. ROSETTALIGAND: protein-small molecule docking with full sidechain flexibility. Proteins. 2006;65:538–48.
  11. Marialke J, Tietze S, Apostolakis J. Similarity based docking. J Chem Inf Model. 2008;48:186–96.
  12. Харитонов, Л. В., et al. "Влияние дипептида тимогена и его сочетания со стимулятором лейкопоэза на всасывание иммуноглобулинов у новорожденных телят." Ветеринарный врач 5 (2014): 33-39.
  13. Величко, А. К., В. Б. Соловьев, and М. Т. Генгин. "Методы лабораторного определения общей перекись разрушающей активности ферментов растений" Известия Пензенского государственного педагогического университета им. ВГ Белинского 18 (2009): 44-48.
  14. Volkova, Darya S., et al. "Substituted 4-nitrosopyrazoles in the diels-alder reaction." Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture 13.5 (2021): 104-119.
Информация об авторах

Teacher Bukhara State University, Research Laboratory "Chemistry of Coordination Compounds" named after Academician N.A., Republic of Uzbekistan, Bukhara

преподаватель Бухарский государственный университет, НИЛ «Химия координационных соединений» имени академика Н.А Парпиева, Республика Узбекистан, г. Бухара

Assistant, Bukhara State University, Uzbekistan, Bukhara

ассистент Бухарский государственный университет, Узбекистан, г. Бухара

Student, Bukhara State University, Uzbekistan, Bukhara

студент, Бухарский государственный университет, Узбекистан, г. Бухара

Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, senior researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan named after O.S. Sodikov, Republic Uzbekistan, Tashkent

кандидат физико-математических наук, ст. науч. сотр., Институт биоорганической химии АН РУз им. О.С. Содикова, Республика Узбекистан, г. Ташкент

Журнал зарегистрирован Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор), регистрационный номер ЭЛ №ФС77-55878 от 17.06.2013
Учредитель журнала - ООО «МЦНО»
Главный редактор - Ларионов Максим Викторович.
Top