Specialist Degree,
St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation,
Russia, St. Petersburg
E-mail: franke-20@mail.ru
УДК 657
Abstract
This paper analyzes the oil market situation in 2025 and evaluates the financial performance of Gazprom within the context of current industry trends. The study identifies three key factors influencing the market: global oil prices, the USD/RUB exchange rate, and the discount of Urals crude relative to Brent crude oil. It was determined that oil prices declined throughout 2025, while exchange rate fluctuations and sanctions significantly affected export revenues. Additionally, it was revealed that increased discounts on Russian oil and logistical constraints continued to pressure profitability. The financial statements of Gazprom were analyzed and compared with major competitors, including Lukoil and Rosneft. The analysis showed a decline in revenue across the industry, primarily driven by lower prices and currency effects. However, it was found that Gazprom managed to significantly improve its financial result compared to 2024 due to cost optimization, reduced tax burden, and stabilization of non-operating losses.
The study substantiates that the company’s improved performance is largely consistent with market conditions rather than financial misrepresentation. It was concluded that despite external pressures such as sanctions and geopolitical instability, the company successfully adapted its operations. The results confirm that internal efficiency measures and macroeconomic factors played a decisive role in shaping financial outcomes in 2025.
Аннотация
В данной статье анализируется ситуация на нефтяном рынке в 2025 году и оцениваются финансовые показатели "Газпрома" в контексте текущих тенденций отрасли. В исследовании определены три ключевых фактора, влияющих на рынок: мировые цены на нефть, обменный курс доллара США к российскому рублю и скидка на нефть марки Urals по отношению к нефти марки Brent. Было установлено, что цены на нефть снижались в течение 2025 года, в то время как колебания обменного курса и санкции существенно повлияли на доходы от экспорта. Кроме того, выяснилось, что увеличение скидок на российскую нефть и логистические ограничения продолжали оказывать давление на прибыльность.
Финансовая отчетность «Газпрома» была проанализирована и сопоставлена с отчетностью основных конкурентов, в том числе «Лукойла» и «Роснефти». Анализ показал снижение выручки по всей отрасли, в первую очередь из-за снижения цен и влияния валютных курсов. Однако было установлено, что «Газпрому» удалось значительно улучшить свои финансовые показатели по сравнению с 2024 годом за счет оптимизации затрат, снижения налогового бремени и стабилизации убытков, не связанных с основной деятельностью. Исследование показало, что улучшение показателей компании в значительной степени обусловлено рыночными условиями, а не искажением финансовой отчетности. Был сделан вывод, что, несмотря на внешнее давление, такое как санкции и геополитическая нестабильность, компания успешно адаптировала свою деятельность к новым условиям. Результаты исследования подтверждают, что решающую роль в формировании финансовых показателей в 2025 году сыграли меры по повышению внутренней эффективности и макроэкономические факторы.
Keywords: analysis, financial statements, company, results, 2025, PJSC Gazprom.
Ключевые слова: анализ, финансовая отчетность, компания, результаты, 2025 год, ПАО "Газпром.
Introduction
In this paper, I will select the oil market for 2025 and choose public company on this market and analyze its financial statements for 2025. Make and prove a conclusion.
I will divide my work into parts. The first 3 parts will describe the market situation. In part 4 I will select a company to analyze its financial results, briefly review its operation over the selected period and compare it with competitors from the industry. In the end, I will write a conclusion in which I will state a hypothesis and prove or disprove it in detail.
Materials and methods
The research is based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis. The primary data source was the annual financial statements of Gazprom for 2025, obtained from official corporate disclosures. Comparative analysis was conducted using publicly available financial data of key industry competitors, including Lukoil and Rosneft.
Macroeconomic indicators such as oil prices, the USD/RUB exchange rate, and production volumes were analyzed using data from analytical agencies and official statistics.
In addition, elements of factor analysis were used to assess the impact of external variables such as sanctions, exchange rate fluctuations, and oil price dynamics on company performance. The study also employed a descriptive approach to interpret geopolitical and market developments affecting the oil industry in 2025.
Results and discussion
Part 1. Oil exchange rate in 2025
I want to highlight 3 main components that form the situation on the oil market: oil price, USD/RUB rate and discount URALS/BRENT. And I would like to start with oil prices. Key points:
/Shaidullin.files/image001.png)
Figure 1. Oil prices from Finam.ru broker
Iran is one of the top oil producing countries, but the country consumes most of its oil itself, so only about 1/3 of Iran's oil enters the international market, and breaks in exports will not cause long and strong price fluctuations.
In other words, prolonged market shocks from breaks in the Iranian oil industry should not be awaited. Looking ahead, based on political statements, there is a risk of limiting the Strait of Hormuz, which passes about 25% of the world's oil. As a result, in the short term, we should face an increase in the volatility of oil prices, as a result, the potential for oil companies.
Part 2. USD/RUB exchange rate
The second important component of my analysis is the dollar/ruble exchange rate, as it directly affects the revenue from oil exports. Key points:
/Shaidullin.files/image002.png)
Figure 2. USD/RUB exchange rate from cbr.ru
Part 3. Discount on Urals oil
I would like to highlight discounts and the oil price ceiling as the third important component in assessing the market situation. Key points:
/Shaidullin.files/image003.jpg)
Figure 3. Discount on Russian Urals oil to Brent
Russia creatively approached the issue of avoiding sanctions, began to purchase its own tankers, and created a shadow fleet by chartering tankers to sell products (a big disadvantage and risk is that no one will agree to insure such cargo, or it will be irrationally expensive, reputational risks in the event of an accident or disaster, and increased shipping costs). This has helped to stabilize the situation, but Russian companies have to sell raw materials and products at low prices, which affects profits.
Part 4. Company – PJSC Gazprom
To evaluate and compare the company's report with the situation on the oil market in 2025, I chose a company PJSC Gazprom based on the annual accounting (financial) statements for 2025 from the official website gazprom.ru. I will briefly outline the main points of the report and compare it with competitors in the industry. Based on this, I will draw conclusions.
/Shaidullin.files/1.png)
Figure 4. Financial statement
/Shaidullin.files/2.png)
Figure 5. Financial statement
/Shaidullin.files/3.png)
Picture 6. Financial statement
Table 1. Main competitors
|
Gazprom |
LUKOIL |
Rosneft |
|
|
Hydrocarbon production (million tons of net energy) |
130,7 (+3%) |
74,9(-2,2%) |
246,6(-3,6%) |
|
Revenue (trillion rubles) |
3,6 (–12%) |
3,8 (–14,8%) |
8,2 (–18,8%) |
|
Net profit (loss) (billion rubles) |
246 (–49%) |
–1 059(-180%) |
293 (–73%) |
Conclusion
Analyzing the report, a sharp rise in the company's net profit by the end of 2025, 11.3 billion rubles, compared with a loss of 1.076 trillion rubles in 2024, immediately catches the eye. This suggests a hypothesis about unreliability, a possible attempt to underestimate losses. I will try to go from the opposite and, based on figures and facts, analyze how much changes in the market situation contributed to such a change in the company's results and disprove this hypothesis.
A drop in production by little more than 1% and a decrease in exports of oil and refined products by 1% by the end of 2025 in Russia. The company was able to show a small 3% increase in production by the end of the year, but together with the 24% drop in the dollar, revenue from the sale of oil and oil and gas products fell by 11.7%, which looks very fair, since the exchange rate directly affects revenue.
The decrease in sales revenue is partially сompensated by a decrease in the cost of sales, including: oil sales by 3.5% and sales of refined products by 3.8%, which indicates a decrease in production and supply costs, which in absolute terms results in a decrease in expenses by 25.8 billion rubles.
The fall in revenue from competitors in the industry is similar. The lack of significant growth in production and exports, as well as the strong depreciation of the currency, had a big impact. As a result, companies receive losses for the year, only Lukoil looks abnormal, the annual result of which was affected by the imposition of sanctions and the loss of foreign assets.
I conclude that the company's performance in terms of production and sales of oil products and raw materials is in line with the market trend. Thanks to the right management decisions, the company has been able to adapt to the situation, reduce costs, find new markets, and find ways to avoid restrictions and increase production.
The company's total revenue (-6.6%) from 2024 was greatly affected by a decrease in gas sales of 5.5%. Despite this, by optimizing the cost of production and supply of raw materials and products, the company manages to reduce the total cost of sales from 4.812 trillion to 4.125 trillion rubles, by 14.3%, and as a result gross profit increased by 19.2% to 1.721 trillion rubles.
The negative balance of other income and expenses amounted to 765 billion rubles, compared to 1.436 trillion rubles a year earlier. It should be noted that the significant loss in 2024 may have been caused by the revaluation of the shares of Gazprom Neft, 95.68% of the company's shares belong to PJSC Gazprom. The loss of 25% of the total capitalization, this led to a total loss of about 750 billion rubles.
The return of income tax for the year resulted in a profit of 152.7 billion rubles for the company, including the decision to cancel the increase in mineral extraction tax from January 1, 2025, which resulted in a reduction in the tax load and cost of production.
The company has increased its inventory of raw materials and products by 2.3%, which provides potential for profit generation due to the high demand for energy resources and the ongoing unstable geopolitical situation in the Middle East.
Long-term debts have been reduced by 9.2%, including due to the conditions of a tight monetary policy and prohibitive financing rates. The company is not increasing its loans and is trying to close its long-term liabilities using its own funds.
Based on the figures, it can also be concluded that optimization is taking place within the company itself, as the reduction of corporate and management expenses has resulted in savings of approximately 47 billion rubles (2.8%) compared to 2024.
Based on the analysis conducted above, I believe that the company's performance accurately reflects the current situation in the oil market, and the figures show significant changes since 2024, leading to a positive result. After the early shock to the market caused by the imposition of sanctions, the situation with production and exports is currently quite stable, with no much growth or decline, and there is a change in sales markets and intermediaries for concluding deals. The geopolitical escalation has a significant impact on the indices, leading to increased volatility in the oil and global currency markets, making analysis and prediction more difficult. However, if the conditions remain until the peak energy demand season, the company's profits may increase. However, there is a risk of additional sanctions, a sudden change in oil prices, and increased oil production and exports by other countries.
Additionally, I would like to clarify that the above is my personal opinion and does not constitute an investment recommendation.
References: