METAPHORS IN LANGUAGE: HOW THEY SHAPE OUR PERCEPTION OF REALITY

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates how metaphors in language influence human perception of reality. Drawing from cognitive linguistics and psychological research, the study explores the foundational role metaphors play in structuring thought, emotion, and decision-making. Through qualitative analysis of common metaphorical expressions and review of experimental studies, this paper reveals how linguistic metaphors are not mere literary devices but essential cognitive tools that shape our conceptual systems. Findings suggest that metaphorical language affects personal worldview, social attitudes, and cultural understanding.

АННОТАЦИЯ

В этой статье исследуется, как метафоры в языке влияют на восприятие человеком реальности. Опираясь на когнитивную лингвистику и психологические исследования, исследование исследует основополагающую роль метафор в структурировании мышления, эмоций и принятия решений. Благодаря качественному анализу распространенных метафорических выражений и обзору экспериментальных исследований эта статья показывает, что лингвистические метафоры являются не просто литературными средствами, а важными когнитивными инструментами, которые формируют наши концептуальные системы. Результаты показывают, что метафорический язык влияет на личное мировоззрение, социальное отношение и культурное понимание.

Keywords: metaphors, language, perception, reality, thought, conceptual metaphor, culture, interpretation.

Ключевые слова: метафоры, язык, восприятие, реальность, мысль, концептуальная метафора, культура, интерпретация.

Introduction

Metaphors are often regarded as stylistic elements of language used for poetic or rhetorical effect. However, modern research in cognitive linguistics-especially the work of Lakoff and Johnson (1980)-has revealed that metaphors are central to human thought. Language is not just a medium for communication but a framework for perceiving and organizing reality. When we say "time is money" or "he attacked my argument," we do not merely speak figuratively-we reveal how we conceptualize time as a resource or argument as war.

This paper aims to examine how metaphors in everyday language shape human perception and behavior. By analyzing commonly used metaphorical expressions and reviewing psychological studies on the topic, this study will illustrate the powerful and often unconscious role that metaphor plays in shaping how individuals experience and interact with the world around them.

Literature review

The role of metaphor in language has long intrigued linguists, philosophers, and cognitive scientists. Traditionally, metaphors were considered primarily poetic or decorative elements of speech, serving aesthetic or rhetorical functions (Richards, 1936). However, the cognitive revolution in linguistics challenged this view, most notably through the seminal work of Lakoff and Johnson (1980), who argued that metaphor is fundamental to human thought, not just language. Their Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) posits that metaphors structure the ways in which people conceptualize both abstract and everyday phenomena, serving as cognitive tools that shape reasoning and behavior.

Extensive empirical evidence supports the pervasiveness of metaphor in everyday language. Corpus studies by Gibbs (1994) and Deignan (2005) have demonstrated that a significant proportion of common speech and writing is metaphorical in nature. These expressions are not random; rather, they reflect systematic mappings between a source domain (often concrete or physical) and a target domain (often abstract or complex).

Methods.

To examine how metaphors shape perception, this study adopted a two-pronged methodological approach:

1. Qualitative Analysis of Language Use: Examples of metaphorical language were collected from natural conversations, literary texts, and media sources. The data were coded for metaphorical expressions and analyzed for their thematic domains and underlying conceptual mappings.

2. Review of Experimental Studies: Recent psycholinguistic experiments investigating the cognitive effects of metaphoric framing were reviewed. These studies typically involve presenting subjects with metaphorically framed scenarios and measuring subsequent attitudes, reasoning, or decision-making. Together, these methods provide both descriptive and empirical perspectives on how metaphors influence thought and perception.

Results

The linguistic analysis confirmed that many English expressions are deeply metaphorical, rooted in conceptual metaphors that reflect embodied experiences. For instance, expressions such as “he fell into depression” or “she rose to the occasion” reflect vertical metaphors linking emotion and performance to spatial orientation. These metaphors are not arbitrary-they rely on sensory experience and bodily perception, such as up being good and down being bad.

The review of empirical studies further supports the idea that metaphor shapes perception. In one experiment by Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2011), participants read about crime framed either as a "beast" or a "virus." Those who read the "beast" frame were more likely to support enforcement solutions (e.g., police patrols), while the "virus" group favored social reforms. This framing effect occurred even though the only difference in the passages was a single metaphor.

Another study found that using economic metaphors like "the market is a living organism" or "the market is a machine" significantly affected how people interpreted financial news and policy options. These findings suggest that metaphors can guide reasoning and even influence beliefs and choices without the speaker or listener being consciously aware of the framing.

Thematic analysis identified several dominant conceptual metaphors, such as:

- Time is Money: "Spend time," "waste time," "save time."

- Argument is War: "Defend your position," "attacked my claims."

- Ideas are Food: "Half-baked idea," "digest information."

- Emotions are Weather: "Stormy relationship," "cloud of sadness."

These metaphors reflect habitual ways of conceptualizing abstract domains using more concrete experiences.

Discussion

The findings underscore that metaphors function not merely as rhetorical flourishes but as fundamental cognitive tools. They shape how we organize information, interpret experiences, and arrive at decisions. Operating largely beneath conscious awareness, metaphors subtly reinforce worldviews and embed ideological assumptions into everyday discourse.

Consider, for instance, how labeling immigration as a “flood” or “invasion” evokes fear and defensiveness, while framing it as a “journey” or “quest for opportunity” elicits empathy and openness. Such linguistic choices carry profound implications for how issues are perceived and addressed.

Recognizing the cognitive role of metaphor holds significance across diverse domains—education, politics, media, and psychotherapy. Educators can empower students to identify and critique metaphorical constructs, thereby sharpening analytical thinking. Politicians may strategically adopt more ethical metaphors to shape public debate. Therapists, meanwhile, can explore clients’ metaphorical language to uncover underlying beliefs about identity and life circumstances. Yet, while metaphors are potent, they can also be constraining. An overreliance on a single metaphorical schema may narrow perception. For example, perceiving life exclusively as a “battle” might foster chronic stress, whereas interpreting it as a “dance” could promote adaptability and joy. Thus, metaphorical literacy not only enhances self-awareness but also supports more nuanced and constructive communication.

Cognitive and Cultural Implications

Metaphors are central to how we conceptualize abstract domains such as time, argumentation, and emotion, thereby playing a critical role in the structuring of knowledge (Lakoff & Johnson, 2003). Additionally, because metaphor usage varies across languages and cultures, it both reflects and sustains culturally specific worldviews. For example, while English speakers typically envision time as a linear progression, speakers of Aymara conceptualize it in markedly different spatial terms (Núñez & Sweetser, 2006).

The capacity of metaphor to shape perception has both ethical and pragmatic consequences. Since metaphors inform reasoning and influence policy preferences, critical awareness of metaphorical framing is vital—particularly in fields such as journalism, education, and governance. By actively interrogating metaphorical language, individuals can resist the passive internalization of limiting conceptual frameworks embedded in dominant metaphors.

Conclusion.

Metaphors are not just linguistic flourishes; they are fundamental to how we think and perceive the world. This paper shows that metaphorical language influences our emotions, decisions, and societal views. By becoming aware of the metaphors we use and encounter, we can gain better control over how reality is framed in our minds and in our cultures. Further research should continue to explore how metaphor interacts with other cognitive biases and how metaphorical education could foster more reflective and open-minded societies.

References: