THE ROLE OF EMPATHY IN USER EXPERIENCE DESIGN: BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN USERS AND DESIGNERS

ABSTRACT

The article is devoted to the role of empathy in shaping user experience, its importance for overcoming barriers between designers and the audience. Its goal is to study techniques and tools that allow designers to penetrate the world of needs, emotional states, and contexts of user interaction with products.

The article discusses current approaches. Among them, the use of virtual reality stands out to create conditions conducive to the development of empathy. Special attention is paid to ethnographic methods of studying user behavior, analyzing audience path maps. The use of which contributes to an accurate understanding of emotions.

The conclusions emphasize that the integration of an empathic approach into UX design creates the conditions for developing solutions that take into account the diverse needs of the audience. This makes the products affordable, convenient, and sustainable in terms of long-term use.

The practical value of scientific work lies in providing designers and managers with tools and recommendations for building user interfaces aimed at the audience. The data presented in the article will be useful for students learning design thinking. The work describes modern methods and design principles that take into account human factors. This approach generates a positive response from users and an attachment to the brand.

АННОТАЦИЯ

Статья посвящена рассмотрению роли эмпатии в формировании пользовательского опыта, её значению для преодоления барьеров между дизайнерами, аудиторией. Ее цель заключается в изучении методик, инструментов, позволяющих проектировщикам проникать в мир потребностей, эмоциональных состояний, контекстов взаимодействия пользователей с продуктами.

В статье рассматриваются актуальные подходы. Среди них выделяется использование виртуальной реальности для создания условий, способствующих развитию эмпатии. Особое внимание уделяется этнографическим методам изучения поведения пользователей, анализу карт пути аудитории. Применение которых, способствует точному пониманию эмоций.

Выводы подчёркивают, что интеграция эмпатического подхода в проектирование UX создаёт условия для разработки решений, учитывающих разнообразные потребности аудитории. Это делает продукты доступными, удобными, устойчивыми с точки зрения долгосрочного использования.

Практическая ценность научной работы заключается в предоставлении дизайнерам, менеджерам инструментов, рекомендаций для построения пользовательских интерфейсов, ориентированных на аудиторию. Представленные в статье данные будут полезны студентам, осваивающим дизайн-мышление. Работа описывает современные методы, принципы проектирования, учитывающие человеческие факторы. Такой подход формирует у пользователей положительный отклик, привязанность к бренду.

Keywords: empathy, UX design, user experience, virtual reality, ethnographic research, inclusivity, sustainability.

Ключевые слова: эмпатия, UX-дизайн, пользовательский опыт, виртуальная реальность, этнографические исследования, инклюзивность, устойчивость.

Introduction

Modern approaches to creating user experiences require a high level of technical expertise and analysis of the cognitive and emotional characteristics of the audience. The diversity and increasing complexity of digital products compel designers to account for a wide range of usage contexts, individual motivations, and expectations of users interacting with these systems. However, development practices often reveal discrepancies between the perception envisioned by developers and the actual impressions of end users. These discrepancies arise from differences in professional priorities and approaches to data analysis, leading to solutions that do not align with the needs of the target audience.

Empathy, defined as a designer's ability to understand the experiences and perceptions of users, plays a critical role in addressing such gaps. This tool enables the identification of audience needs and consideration of potential expectations that may not yet be explicitly expressed. The application of empathy in contemporary UX design has transcended its subjective origins, evolving into a structured process integrated into development stages, including target audience research and prototype testing.

The importance of this topic is underscored by the increasing complexity of modern interfaces, the need for inclusivity in design, and rising user expectations for the convenience and accessibility of digital solutions. Emerging technological advancements, such as virtual reality and artificial empathy systems, provide designers with opportunities to create personalized solutions. At the same time, the development of methodologies capable of systematically integrating empathy into the design process and objectively evaluating its impact remains a relevant challenge. This makes the study of this aspect crucial for the practical and theoretical advancement of user experience [15; 16].

The objective of this work is to analyze the importance of empathy in UX design, examine existing methodologies for its application, and develop practical recommendations for its integration into design processes.

Materials and Methods

Scientific research on empathy in design activities encompasses a wide range of topics, including the integration of virtual reality, the study of factors influencing its development, the creation of measurement methodologies, and the analysis of its significance in the context of sustainable development and cultural characteristics.

Virtual reality technologies provide deeper insights into user needs, enhancing the adaptation of design solutions to their requirements. The study by Hu X., Casakin H., and Georgiev G. V. [1] presents an approach based on virtual reality that helps bridge the gap between designers and users. This approach involves direct integration of user data into the design process, contributing to the development of intuitive solutions. Similarly, Hu X., Nanjappan V., and Georgiev G. V. [4] describe how these tools aid in considering audience expectations and facilitating the creation of high-quality solutions. Grech A., Wodehouse A., and Brisco R. [2] highlight idea generation focused on satisfying the needs of various target groups. The article by Underwood G. S. et al. [9] examines overcoming cultural differences and addressing the preferences of groups with diverse social backgrounds.

Li J., and Hölttä-Otto K. [3] explore the issue of cultural differences limiting the universality of design methods. Marsden N., and Wittwer A. [5] point out the risk of neglecting the needs of specific groups, which may lead to their exclusion from design solutions.

The study by Salmi A., Li J., and Hölttä-Otto K. [6] describes the use of facial expression analysis algorithms that help objectively assess user reactions. Eren G. H. [10] proposes a game-based methodology aimed at developing human-centered solutions during the early stages. Zhu Q., and Luo J. [11] present the concept of artificial empathy, which automates the process of analyzing audience requests.

The relationship between empathy and ecological and social aspects is examined in various studies. Prabhu R., Alsager Alzayed M., and Starkey E. M. [7] emphasize that focusing on user needs enables the creation of projects with long-term impact. Sandman H., Meguid T., and Levänen J. [8] analyze the application of empathetic approaches in designing healthcare facilities, demonstrating their influence on creating comfortable environments.

In the field of empathy, its role in strengthening interpersonal connections and influencing interactions with others is emphasized. Kendra Cherry, MS [12], highlights the importance of empathy as a means to deepen human relationships. It enables the understanding of others' emotions and appropriate responses to their experiences, which is critical in both personal and professional contexts. Empathy is considered a component of social competence, enhancing communication and aiding in conflict resolution.

In the study by Kelley T. and Kelley D. [13], the idea of developing creative potential is explored. The authors argue that creativity is not only a natural ability but also a skill that depends on viewing failures as part of the process. This perspective opens new opportunities for applying innovation across various fields, including marketing, design, and product management.

The article by Lemon K. N. and Verhoef P. C. [14] examines an approach to analyzing customer experience at every stage of interaction with a brand. The authors identify key moments shaping customer perception and propose ways to model these moments to enhance service quality and loyalty. The method focuses on precise customer interactions, emphasizing not only the product but also the process of its use.

The research by Cooper A., Reimann R., and Cronin D. [15] on user interface design underscores the importance of prioritizing user needs when creating digital solutions. The authors emphasize the necessity of developing intuitive solutions that align with end-user expectations, combining theoretical foundations with practical recommendations.

Hassenzahl M. [16] focuses on interaction design, asserting that creating intuitive and effective solutions requires adherence to principles of human-centered design. He highlights the significance of emotional perception and user experience during interactions with a product, contributing to solutions that meet user needs and expectations.

Virtual reality technologies are viewed as a tool for fostering empathy, though further development is needed to address the needs of underrepresented groups. One of the ongoing challenges is integrating empathy across all stages of design activity.

Results and Discussion

In the context of user experience (UX) and user interface (UI) design, empathy is an essential skill that enables designers to create user-centered products addressing the needs, expectations, and pain points of their target audience. Empathy allows designers to deeply understand the user journey, focusing on every touchpoint and interaction, particularly those that may cause difficulty or frustration. By applying an empathetic approach, designers can develop more accessible and effective designs that align with user needs and expectations [13; 14].

Empathy manifests in various forms depending on the situation. Currently, three distinct types of empathy are identified:

1. Cognitive empathy involves the ability to understand another person's mental state, including their thoughts and emotions. This concept is closely related to the theory of mind, which refers to the ability to consider what others might be thinking.
2. Somatic empathy includes experiencing physical sensations or reactions in response to another person's emotional state. For instance, witnessing someone's embarrassment might cause an individual to blush or feel stomach discomfort [7; 11].
3. Emotional empathy enables individuals to comprehend another person's emotions and respond appropriately. This type of empathy may evoke concern for another’s well-being or personal experiences. These types of empathy are illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Three types of empathy

In design, empathy facilitates the analysis of problems, allowing designers to view challenges from the user's perspective. This process is rooted in human-centered design principles, which assert that understanding user experiences is fundamental to developing effective solutions. Additionally, empathy fosters a mindset that values user feedback and iterative testing. By prioritizing user experiences, designers are better equipped to identify gaps between user expectations and actual interactions with products or services. This approach not only ensures precise problem identification but also encourages continuous product improvement, where solutions evolve based on user interactions and feedback.

To implement an empathetic approach, specialized methods and tools have been developed to study the audience and adapt designs to meet their real needs [7; 8; 12].

Ethnographic observations and contextual analysis. This method emphasizes the importance of observing authentic behavior patterns in natural settings. The ethnographic approach to UX design and technology research examines how individuals interact with technologies in their daily lives. Ethnographic studies provide designers with insights into the everyday experiences of potential users, revealing inherent trends and behavioral patterns as they naturally emerge. Furthermore, these studies allow researchers to repeatedly encounter examples from users’ lives. Unlike surveys, interviews, or focus groups, which typically capture user information at specific points in time, ethnographic research is characterized by its continuous nature, where data collection occurs throughout the study. This method also provides crucial contextual information, enabling researchers to observe the particular situations and circumstances in which a product will be used.

Critical incident method. This approach helps identify audience reactions resulting from interactions with an interface and allows for design adjustments based on these findings [2; 4].

Experience mapping. The creation of empathy maps and user journeys offers a visual representation of users' cognitive and emotional trajectories. User personas serve as fictional representations of specific audience segments, reflecting their goals, pain points, and motivations. These personas address the critical question: "For whom are we designing?" By embodying typical users, personas enable designers to tailor their approaches to the unique characteristics and requirements of their users [9]. Below, Figure 2 provides an example of user persona personalization.

Figure 2. Example of User Persona

In contrast, empathy maps are used to visually represent experiences and thoughts. This tool provides a comprehensive overview of how customers perceive and interact with a product, thereby enhancing the understanding of their emotional and cognitive reactions. Below, Figure 3 presents an example of an empathy map.

Figure 3. Example of Empathy Map

The primary distinction between user personas and empathy maps lies in their foundation: personas are based on fictional users, while empathy maps derive information from real individuals. Furthermore, while personas provide insights into customer personalities, empathy maps reveal attitudes and behaviors. This complementary relationship between the two tools enriches the UX design process, fostering a user-centered approach that ultimately enhances product development.

Regarding the integration of empathy into the design process, several approaches are identified. Co-design workshops allow teams to share a collective understanding of user experiences. These workshops enable team members to exchange ideas more effectively and develop solutions aimed at addressing identified problems. This collaborative environment fosters creativity and innovation, as diverse perspectives contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of user needs [3; 5].

Engaging cross-functional teams in brainstorming sessions encourages the exchange of ideas and the cultivation of collective empathy toward users. Prototyping and testing further enhance the process by encouraging designers to observe users interacting with prototypes to identify emotional responses and pain points. Establishing feedback channels with users enables iterative improvements to the design based on user input [6; 11].

Thus, empathy in UX design is not merely about understanding the user but is a structured process encompassing a range of analytical and practical tools. Its application enables the creation of products that not only meet functional requirements but also address user needs. By integrating empathetic methods throughout the development stages, professionals bridge the gap between audience expectations and design intentions, creating solutions that stand out in the digital world. The empathy-based approach in UX design combines academic research, technological tools, and iterative product refinement. This method ensures that user needs are accounted for, resulting in solutions that make interactions with the product intuitive and seamless. Designers transform abstract ideas into functional projects that enhance user interactions with technology.

Conclusion

In conclusion, empathy serves as a critical factor in the development of supplementary products designed to address the practical needs of the audience. It bridges the gap between interface developers and users by addressing both emotional and cognitive aspects of interaction.

This involves the use of ethnography, interaction mapping, and virtual reality. These approaches enable solutions to be implemented in real-world contexts while ensuring products accommodate diverse usage scenarios. Empathy is applied at every stage of development—from analyzing audience characteristics to testing prototypes and implementing the final product. This process ensures the creation of a digital environment that meets the needs of various user groups and accounts for cultural differences.

The consistent application of empathetic principles in design fosters the development of innovative solutions that align with audience expectations and address the challenges of the digital environment based on actual user needs.

References:

1. Hu X., Casakin H., Georgiev G. V. Bridging designer-user gap with a virtual reality-based empathic design approach: contextual information details // Proceedings of the Design Society. – 2023. – Vol. 3. – Pp. 797–806.
2. Grech A., Wodehouse A., Brisco R. Designer Empathy in Virtual Reality: Transforming the Designer Experience Closer to the User // International Association of Societies of Design Research. – 2023. – Doi:  10.21606/iasdr.2023.380.
3. Li J., Hölttä-Otto K. Inconstant Empathy – Interpersonal Factors That Influence the Incompleteness of User Understanding // Journal of Mechanical Design. – 2023. – Vol. 145 (2) – Pp. 021403.
4. Hu X., Nanjappan V., Georgiev G. V. Seeing from the users: an outlook to virtual-reality based empathic design research // Proceedings of the Design Society. – 2021. – Vol. 1. – Pp. 2601–2610.
5. Marsden N., Wittwer A. Empathy and exclusion in the design process //Frontiers in Human Dynamics. – 2022. – Vol. 4. – pp. 1050580.
6. Salmi A., Li J., Holtta-Otto K. Automatic facial expression analysis as a measure of user-designer empathy //Journal of Mechanical Design. – 2023. – Vol. 145. – №. 3. – Pp. 031403.
7. Prabhu R., Alsager Alzayed M., Starkey E. M. Not Good Enough? Exploring Relationships Between Novice Designers’ Trait Empathy, Their Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intentions Toward Sustainability, and the Self-Evaluated Sustainability of Their Solutions //Journal of Mechanical Design. – 2023. – Vol. 145. (4). – Pp. 042301.
8. Sandman H., Meguid T., Levänen J. Unboxing empathy: eflecting on architectural design for maternal health // CoDesign. – 2020. – № 18(2). – Pp. 260–278.
9. Underwood G. S. et al. Bridging the Empathy Gap: Improving Design Empathy Across Cultural Barriers // DS 123: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2023). – 2023.
10. Eren G. H. Tasarim sürecinde empati kurmayi destekleyen bir yaklaşim olarak canlandirma teknikleri //SSD Journal. – 2022. – Vol. 7 (32). – Pp. 241–252.
11. Zhu Q., Luo J. Toward artificial empathy for human-centered design: a framework // International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. – American Society of Mechanical Engineers. – 2023. – Vol. 87318. – Pp. V03BT03A072.
12. Kendra Cherry, MS, (2024). What is Empathy? How it helps strengthen our relationships. [Electronic resource] Access mode:https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-empathy-2795562 (date of request: 10.12.2024).
13. Kelley T., & Kelley D. Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All. Crown Business. – 2013.
14. Lemon K. N., Verhoef P. C. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey // Journal of Marketing. – 2016. – Vol. 80(6). – Pp. 69–96.
15. Cooper A., Reimann R., Cronin D. About Face: The Essentials of Interaction Design. Wiley. – 2007.
16. Hassenzahl M. Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons // Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. – 2010. – Vol. 3(1). Pp. 1–95.